Abstract 1708P
Background
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is one of the most lethal urological malignancies with high tumor heterogeneity, and reliable biomarkers are still needed for its diagnosis and prognosis. Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) as a prognostic marker in ccRCC remain undetermined.
Methods
Tumor tissue samples were used for whole exome sequencing (WES) and clonal mutations were selected for the customized MRD panel. Blood samples were collected for MRD detection both preoperatively (within 24 hours before surgery) and at multiple postoperative time points including 1, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months.
Results
A total of 70 ccRCC patients including 51 (72.9%) males and 19 (27.1%) females, with a median age of 56 years old (23-78 years old). Based on WES, we found that 64% (4936/7715) of the mutated genes were unique to each patient with ccRCC, and 95.5% (2148/2249) of selected tumor-informed single nucleotide variants (SNV) were variants with unknown significance, suggesting that tumor-informed MRD is superior to panel-based MRD in ccRCC. The positive rates of MRD preoperatively, and at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months postoperatively were 49.2% (32/65), 5% (3/60), 7% (3/43), 4.8% (1/21), and 10% (1/10), respectively. Based on the pathological staging (pT1-2, pT3, pT4), the preoperative MRD positivity rates for patients were 39.1% (18/46), 72.2% (13/18), and 100% (1/1), respectively. The respective negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV) of MRD testing were 100% (63/63) and 42.9% (3/7). Due to the follow-up time is relatively short (median = 263 days), only three patients have experienced recurrence and metastasis, and there was one additional patient with suspected recurrence among the MRD-positive population.Patient follow-up is still ongoing.
Conclusions
This study suggests that tumor-informed MRD may be superior to panel-based MRD in ccRCC. Despite the short follow-up, MRD demonstrates potential in predicting recurrence and metastasis. With NPV and PPV at 100% and 42.9% respectively, the importance of continuous MRD monitoring for long-term prognosis assessment is underscored.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Linhui Wang.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1709P - Outcomes with novel combinations in non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC): ORACLE study
Presenter: Deepak Kilari
Session: Poster session 11
1710P - Exposure-response (E/R) relationship of nivolumab (N) and ipilimumab (I) in patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell clear cell carcinoma (mRCC) from the randomised phase II BIONIKK study
Presenter: Benoit Blanchet
Session: Poster session 11
1711P - Real-word data challenging the treatment paradigm in metastatic renal cancer: Time to separate IMDC intermediate / poor risk groups?
Presenter: John McGrane
Session: Poster session 11
1712P - Real-world efficacy of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab and its practical predictive biomarkers in advanced renal cell carcinoma: First analysis from RENOIR study [KCSG GU22-13]
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: Poster session 11
1713P - A deep learning approach utilizing the electronic health record (EHR) to identify cancer recurrence in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Jue Hou
Session: Poster session 11
1714P - Detection and monitoring of translocation renal cell carcinoma via epigenomic profiling of cell-free DNA
Presenter: Simon Garinet
Session: Poster session 11
1715P - Interim analysis results from a phase II study of adjuvant penpulimab in very high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Xu Zhang
Session: Poster session 11
1716P - Primary resistance to front-line immune-based combinations in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (ARON-1)
Presenter: martina catalano
Session: Poster session 11