Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 16

592P - Survival analysis of surgical management options for goblet cell adenocarcinoma: Insights from machine learning clustering

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 16

Topics

Cancer Registries

Tumour Site

Gastrointestinal Cancers

Presenters

Marie Line El Asmar

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S428-S481. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1588

Authors

M.L. El Asmar1, M.A.S.H. Mortagy2, K. Chandrakumaran1, J. Ramage1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Gastroenterology, NHS Hampshire Hospitals Foundation Trust - Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, RG24 9NA - Basingstoke/GB
  • 2 Internal Medicine, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, SO22 5DG - Winchester/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 592P

Background

Debate surrounds the surgical management of Goblet cell adenocarcinoma (GCA). However, right hemicolectomy (RHC) remains the standard surgical choice for GCA.

Methods

1154 and 867 patients with GCA were extracted from U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS) databases respectively after excluding patients with missing data. Two clusters for each cohort were created using an unsupervised machine learning K-means model (cluster 0, cluster 1). Clustering was evaluated using silhouette (S), Davies Boulden (DB) and Caliniski Harabasz (CH) scores. Clusters were visualised using principal component analysis (PCA) and T-distributed stochastic neighbour embedding (T-SNE). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) identified clinical features that were the most useful in clustering. Kaplan Meier (KM) statistics and graphs were generated. Decision trees were developed to cluster individual patients in each of the two clusters.

Results

PCA and T-SNE visualisations showed distinct clusters with some overlap in both cohorts. SHAP revealed tumour size and stage as important variables for clustering in SEER, while age and stage were key variables in NCRAS. Clusters description and survival are shown in the table. The two clusters were statistically different in survival based on Cox regression, Log-rank test and KM statistics in both cohorts. Appendectomy and RHC showed similar survival rates across both cohorts and within each cluster of both cohorts. Table: 592P

Characteristics of clusters and 5-year survival rates

Characteristic Clustrer 0Favourable survival Cluster 1Unfavourable survival
Median age, years (SEER) 58 59
Male sex, % (SEER) 48 54
Localised stage, % (SEER) 64 33
Distant stage, % (SEER) 3 19
Tumour size, median mm (SEER) 14 50
5-year survival, % (95% CI) (SEER) 85(82-88) 72(59-72)
Median age, years (NCRAS) 48 68
Male sex, % (NCRAS) 56 43
Localised stage, % (NCRAS) 90 81
Distant stage, % (NCRAS) 4 9
5-year survival, % (95% CI) (NCRAS) 87(83-91) 61(57-66)

Conclusions

After categorising cases into two clusters using unsupervised machine learning, RHC and appendectomy demonstrated comparable survival rates among patients with GCA. Machine learning could facilitate clinicians in exploring the impact of various treatment approaches on survival outcomes.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.