Abstract 2012P
Background
Urothelial cancer (UC), especially with bone metastases, poses significant clinical challenges. Despite its occurrence in 25% to 47% of cases, with 5% to 15% experiencing exclusive bone metastasis, it remains underrecognized and challenging to treat. Despite the approval of multiple immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the survival benefit with ICIs in those with bone metastasis remains unclear. None of the randomized studies specifically investigated the outcomes and efficacy of bone metastases in subgroup analyses. We aim to assess the role and efficacy of ICIs in UC patients with bone metastases using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).
Methods
Using NCDB, we included de-novo metastatic UC cases (2017-2021). We subcategorized patients into bone-only metastases (BoM), bone (B) + brain metastases (mets), B + visceral mets (liver/lung), and B + lymph nodes. Demographics included primary site, first-line treatment (chemo/immunotherapy), age, race, gender, and survival status. OS was analyzed via Kaplan-Meier curves, Log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards model.
Results
3971 eligible UC cases were included. Primary sites were kidney/renal pelvis (82.4%), bladder (12.4%), and ureter (2.6%). BoM occurred in 27%, B + brain in 11%, B + visceral in 51%, and B+ lymph nodes in 11%. 48.1% received first-line chemo, 51.9% first-line ICIs. Most were aged 40-64 (40%), white (84.8%), and male (70%). Patients with B + brain mets had the worst outcomes (HR 1.58, p<0.001), followed by B + visceral mets (HR 1.48, p<0.001), and B + lymph node mets (HR 1.25, p=0.007) compared to BoM. In multivariate analysis, patients receiving first-line chemotherapy had worse outcomes than first-line immunotherapy (HR 1.24, p<0.001) in all cohorts. However, when specifically analyzing the treatment difference among BoM patients, no survival disparity was observed between chemo and ICIs (p=0.32).
Conclusions
Interestingly, our analysis revealed that upper tract UC displays a significantly heightened propensity for bone metastases compared to lower tract UC. Moreover, patients with de-novo metastatic UC with bone met who underwent first line chemo experienced poor outcomes relative to those treated with first-line ICIs.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1987P - TROP-2 as a promising ADC target in penile squamous cell carcinoma that promotes cell proliferation by activating AKT through PKCα pathway
Presenter: Yi Tang
Session: Poster session 13
1988P - Enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab (P) outcomes outside clinical trials and biomarkers of benefit in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma: Analysis of the UNITE study
Presenter: Tanya Jindal
Session: Poster session 13
1989P - Efficacy of enfortumab vedotin (EV) in patients (pts) with (w) advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who have baseline neuropathy (N) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM): A UNITE study analysis
Presenter: Albert Jang
Session: Poster session 13
1990P - MRG002-HER2 ADC combined with pucotenlimab (a PD-1 inhibitor), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC): Preliminary results of a phase I/II study
Presenter: Chuanliang Cui
Session: Poster session 13
1992P - Real-world (RW) characteristics and outcomes in patients (pts) with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) treated with adjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)
Presenter: Hedyeh Ebrahimi
Session: Poster session 13
1993P - A randomized, phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eribulin mesylate in combination with atezolizumab compared to atezolizumab alone in subjects with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell urothelial cancer where cisplatin-based treatment is not an option
Presenter: Anishka D'Souza
Session: Poster session 13
1994P - Updated efficacy profile of the double antibody drug conjugate (DAD) phase I trial: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) plus enfortumab vedotin (EV) in ≥ second line in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster session 13
1995P - Insights into second-line (2L) systemic treatment (tx) receipt in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Results of a retrospective observational study in Germany
Presenter: Günter Niegisch
Session: Poster session 13
1996P - Primary analysis of post-marketing surveillance (PMS) data for avelumab maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with curatively unresectable urothelial carcinoma (UC) in Japan
Presenter: Eiji Kikuchi
Session: Poster session 13