Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 13

2012P - Role of first-line immunotherapy in urothelial cancer with bone metastases: A national cancer database analysis of 3971 patients

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 13

Topics

Tumour Site

Urothelial Cancer

Presenters

Zin Myint

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1135-S1169. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1616

Authors

Z.W. Myint1, F. Lei2, D. Allison3, P. Hensley4, C. Ellis5, B. Huang2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, University of Kentucky/Markey Cancer Center, 40536 - Lexington/US
  • 2 Biostatistics, UK - University of Kentucky - Markey Cancer Center, 40536-0293 - Lexington/US
  • 3 Pathology And Laboratory Medicine, UK - University of Kentucky - Markey Cancer Center, 40536-0293 - Lexington/US
  • 4 Urology Oncology, UK - University of Kentucky - Markey Cancer Center, 40536-0293 - Lexington/US
  • 5 Clinical Pharmacology, UK - University of Kentucky - Markey Cancer Center, 40536-0293 - Lexington/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 2012P

Background

Urothelial cancer (UC), especially with bone metastases, poses significant clinical challenges. Despite its occurrence in 25% to 47% of cases, with 5% to 15% experiencing exclusive bone metastasis, it remains underrecognized and challenging to treat. Despite the approval of multiple immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the survival benefit with ICIs in those with bone metastasis remains unclear. None of the randomized studies specifically investigated the outcomes and efficacy of bone metastases in subgroup analyses. We aim to assess the role and efficacy of ICIs in UC patients with bone metastases using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

Methods

Using NCDB, we included de-novo metastatic UC cases (2017-2021). We subcategorized patients into bone-only metastases (BoM), bone (B) + brain metastases (mets), B + visceral mets (liver/lung), and B + lymph nodes. Demographics included primary site, first-line treatment (chemo/immunotherapy), age, race, gender, and survival status. OS was analyzed via Kaplan-Meier curves, Log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

3971 eligible UC cases were included. Primary sites were kidney/renal pelvis (82.4%), bladder (12.4%), and ureter (2.6%). BoM occurred in 27%, B + brain in 11%, B + visceral in 51%, and B+ lymph nodes in 11%. 48.1% received first-line chemo, 51.9% first-line ICIs. Most were aged 40-64 (40%), white (84.8%), and male (70%). Patients with B + brain mets had the worst outcomes (HR 1.58, p<0.001), followed by B + visceral mets (HR 1.48, p<0.001), and B + lymph node mets (HR 1.25, p=0.007) compared to BoM. In multivariate analysis, patients receiving first-line chemotherapy had worse outcomes than first-line immunotherapy (HR 1.24, p<0.001) in all cohorts. However, when specifically analyzing the treatment difference among BoM patients, no survival disparity was observed between chemo and ICIs (p=0.32).

Conclusions

Interestingly, our analysis revealed that upper tract UC displays a significantly heightened propensity for bone metastases compared to lower tract UC. Moreover, patients with de-novo metastatic UC with bone met who underwent first line chemo experienced poor outcomes relative to those treated with first-line ICIs.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.