Abstract 2012P
Background
Urothelial cancer (UC), especially with bone metastases, poses significant clinical challenges. Despite its occurrence in 25% to 47% of cases, with 5% to 15% experiencing exclusive bone metastasis, it remains underrecognized and challenging to treat. Despite the approval of multiple immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the survival benefit with ICIs in those with bone metastasis remains unclear. None of the randomized studies specifically investigated the outcomes and efficacy of bone metastases in subgroup analyses. We aim to assess the role and efficacy of ICIs in UC patients with bone metastases using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).
Methods
Using NCDB, we included de-novo metastatic UC cases (2017-2021). We subcategorized patients into bone-only metastases (BoM), bone (B) + brain metastases (mets), B + visceral mets (liver/lung), and B + lymph nodes. Demographics included primary site, first-line treatment (chemo/immunotherapy), age, race, gender, and survival status. OS was analyzed via Kaplan-Meier curves, Log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards model.
Results
3971 eligible UC cases were included. Primary sites were kidney/renal pelvis (82.4%), bladder (12.4%), and ureter (2.6%). BoM occurred in 27%, B + brain in 11%, B + visceral in 51%, and B+ lymph nodes in 11%. 48.1% received first-line chemo, 51.9% first-line ICIs. Most were aged 40-64 (40%), white (84.8%), and male (70%). Patients with B + brain mets had the worst outcomes (HR 1.58, p<0.001), followed by B + visceral mets (HR 1.48, p<0.001), and B + lymph node mets (HR 1.25, p=0.007) compared to BoM. In multivariate analysis, patients receiving first-line chemotherapy had worse outcomes than first-line immunotherapy (HR 1.24, p<0.001) in all cohorts. However, when specifically analyzing the treatment difference among BoM patients, no survival disparity was observed between chemo and ICIs (p=0.32).
Conclusions
Interestingly, our analysis revealed that upper tract UC displays a significantly heightened propensity for bone metastases compared to lower tract UC. Moreover, patients with de-novo metastatic UC with bone met who underwent first line chemo experienced poor outcomes relative to those treated with first-line ICIs.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2019P - Disparities in urothelial carcinoma (UC) drug approval: Contrasting North America and Europe
Presenter: Jose Tapia
Session: Poster session 13
2020TiP - SOGUG-NEOWIN: A phase II, open-label, multi-centre trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of erdafitinib (ERDA) monotherapy and ERDA and cetrelimab (CET) as neoadjuvant treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and FGFR gene alterations
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster session 13
2022TiP - Stereotactic treatment with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and enfortumab vedotin: A phase I/II study for localized, cisplatin ineligible, muscle invasive bladder cancer (STAR-EV)
Presenter: Tian Zhang
Session: Poster session 13
2024TiP - NETOS: A personalized approach of neoadjuvant therapy, including INCB099280 monotherapy and bladder preservation, for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIBC) with ctDNA monitoring
Presenter: Valentina Tateo
Session: Poster session 13