Abstract 1995P
Background
Contemporary, real-world data on eligible pts receiving systemic tx following progression on first-line (1L) mUC therapy are needed to inform tx algorithms and identify potential gaps in the mUC care pathway. The objective of this analysis was to determine the prevalence and predictors of 2L tx receipt in pts with mUC in Germany.
Methods
This study identified adults with incident mUC (ICD-10 C65-68 and C77-79) from Jan 2015 to Jun 2021, using data from 2 statutory health insurance claims databases (Jan 2013-Jun 2022; ≈8 million pts). Pts were observed for ≥12 mo post incident mUC diagnosis (index) or until death. Baseline (BL) characteristics were identified 24 mo before index, and multivariable logistic regression analyzed factors associated with receiving 2L tx.
Results
Of 4,290 pts with mUC who were identified, 1,779 (41.5%) received 1L tx (mean age, 69.1 y; male, 74.2%; mean Charlson Comorbidity Index [CCI] score, 5.6; mean follow-up [FU], 19.6 mo). Of these pts, 699 (39.3%) received 2L tx (mean age, 67.6 y; male, 75.3%; mean CCI score, 5.3; mean FU, 22.8 mo). The number of pts with incident mUC who received 2L tx increased over time (index year 2015: 78 pts [11.2%]; 2020: 132 pts [18.9%]). The most common 2L txs were immune checkpoint inhibitors (462 pts [66.1%]), followed by non–platinum-based chemotherapy (non-PBC) in 121 pts (17.3%), and PBC in 116 pts (16.6%). Younger pts and those without other primary malignancies at BL were more likely to receive 2L tx (Table).
Conclusions
A high proportion of pts (60.7%) did not receive 2L tx. Pts who received 2L tx were generally younger and healthier with slightly lower CCI scores and fewer non-UC primary malignancies. Tx rates may be underestimated due to the potential for unaccounted txs from clinical trials. Further research is needed to clarify barriers to accessing 2L tx in this patient population. Table: 1995P
Factors associated with receiving 2L tx in pts with mUC
| Variable | Odds ratio (95% Cl) | p value |
| Age at index (continuous) | 0.98 (0.97-0.99) | Clinical trial identificationEditorial acknowledgementEditorial support was provided by Nucleus Global and was funded by Merck. Legal entity responsible for the studyMerck (CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100009945), as part of a previous alliance between Merck and Pfizer. FundingThis study was sponsored by the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (CrossRef Funder ID: 10.13039/100009945) and was previously conducted under an alliance between the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and Pfizer. DisclosureG. Niegisch: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, MEDAC, Pfizer, BMS, AstraZeneca, Astellas; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, Sanofi, BMS, Merck, Pfizer, Ipsen, Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel, congress registrations: Roche, Pfizer, Merck. M. Kearney: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Merck ; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: Novartis, Merck, UCB. J. Krieger: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Cytel ; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Merck. U. Osowski: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Merck Healthcare Germany GmbH, Weiterstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Merck. B. Deiters: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: GWQ ServicePlus AG. U. Maywald: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: AOK PLUS. T. Wilke: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Employment by IPAM, which received financial support from Cytel to conduct the claims data analyses: IPAM. M.J. Grimm: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer/Vital, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Eusa Pharma, Gilead, Ipsen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche Pharma AG, Takeda, Merck; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel, accommodations, and expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, honoraria: Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eusa Pharma, Ipsen, MSD, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Funding: Bristol Myers Squibb, Intuitive Surgical. Resources from the same session44P - Chemo-immunotherapy combination of mFOLFOX6, bevacizumab and atezolizumab after first-line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer: The COMBATBIL imCORE trialPresenter: Mariano Ponz-Sarvise Session: Poster session 13 47P - First-line pembrolizumab (pembro) + gemcitabine and cisplatin (gem/cis) for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) in the China subpopulation from the phase III KEYNOTE-966 studyPresenter: Shukui Qin Session: Poster session 13 48P - Pattern of expression, transcriptional states and clinical implications of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in curatively-treated cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients (pts): The TILBIL studyPresenter: Maria Pia Quitadamo Session: Poster session 13 49P - Prognostic relevance of baseline exosome-delivered PD-1, PD-L1, pan-BTN3As and BTN3A1 in advanced cholangiocarcinoma patients: Can immune checkpoints act as a sentinel for predicting survival?Presenter: Lidia Rita Corsini Session: Poster session 13 50P - Camrelizumab (Cam) combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) plus low-dose apatinib in first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC)Presenter: yunxin lu Session: Poster session 13 52P - Cadonilimab in combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer (BicureX): A phase II, single-arm clinical trialPresenter: Ji Ma Session: Poster session 13 This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used. For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.
|