Abstract 2012P
Background
Urothelial cancer (UC), especially with bone metastases, poses significant clinical challenges. Despite its occurrence in 25% to 47% of cases, with 5% to 15% experiencing exclusive bone metastasis, it remains underrecognized and challenging to treat. Despite the approval of multiple immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the survival benefit with ICIs in those with bone metastasis remains unclear. None of the randomized studies specifically investigated the outcomes and efficacy of bone metastases in subgroup analyses. We aim to assess the role and efficacy of ICIs in UC patients with bone metastases using the National Cancer Database (NCDB).
Methods
Using NCDB, we included de-novo metastatic UC cases (2017-2021). We subcategorized patients into bone-only metastases (BoM), bone (B) + brain metastases (mets), B + visceral mets (liver/lung), and B + lymph nodes. Demographics included primary site, first-line treatment (chemo/immunotherapy), age, race, gender, and survival status. OS was analyzed via Kaplan-Meier curves, Log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards model.
Results
3971 eligible UC cases were included. Primary sites were kidney/renal pelvis (82.4%), bladder (12.4%), and ureter (2.6%). BoM occurred in 27%, B + brain in 11%, B + visceral in 51%, and B+ lymph nodes in 11%. 48.1% received first-line chemo, 51.9% first-line ICIs. Most were aged 40-64 (40%), white (84.8%), and male (70%). Patients with B + brain mets had the worst outcomes (HR 1.58, p<0.001), followed by B + visceral mets (HR 1.48, p<0.001), and B + lymph node mets (HR 1.25, p=0.007) compared to BoM. In multivariate analysis, patients receiving first-line chemotherapy had worse outcomes than first-line immunotherapy (HR 1.24, p<0.001) in all cohorts. However, when specifically analyzing the treatment difference among BoM patients, no survival disparity was observed between chemo and ICIs (p=0.32).
Conclusions
Interestingly, our analysis revealed that upper tract UC displays a significantly heightened propensity for bone metastases compared to lower tract UC. Moreover, patients with de-novo metastatic UC with bone met who underwent first line chemo experienced poor outcomes relative to those treated with first-line ICIs.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
44P - Chemo-immunotherapy combination of mFOLFOX6, bevacizumab and atezolizumab after first-line therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer: The COMBATBIL imCORE trial
Presenter: Mariano Ponz-Sarvise
Session: Poster session 13
47P - First-line pembrolizumab (pembro) + gemcitabine and cisplatin (gem/cis) for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) in the China subpopulation from the phase III KEYNOTE-966 study
Presenter: Shukui Qin
Session: Poster session 13
48P - Pattern of expression, transcriptional states and clinical implications of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in curatively-treated cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients (pts): The TILBIL study
Presenter: Maria Pia Quitadamo
Session: Poster session 13
49P - Prognostic relevance of baseline exosome-delivered PD-1, PD-L1, pan-BTN3As and BTN3A1 in advanced cholangiocarcinoma patients: Can immune checkpoints act as a sentinel for predicting survival?
Presenter: Lidia Rita Corsini
Session: Poster session 13
50P - Camrelizumab (Cam) combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) plus low-dose apatinib in first-line treatment of advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC)
Presenter: yunxin lu
Session: Poster session 13
52P - Cadonilimab in combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer (BicureX): A phase II, single-arm clinical trial
Presenter: Ji Ma
Session: Poster session 13