Abstract 255P
Background
Breast cancer (BC) is a major global health concern. Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is standard for many cases, aiming to shrink tumors before surgery. Despite its effectiveness, some patients still experience early recurrence (ER), defined as relapse within the 3 years from the start of NAT, impacting their survival. Efforts are being made to predict who is at higher risk of ER using tools like breast MRI and radiomics, which extract information from images. Predicting ER after NAT remains a challenge. The study investigates the potential of radiomics analysis, combined with clinical and radiological variables, in predicting ER.
Methods
Patients with BC who underwent staging MRI, NAT, and surgery at our Center (from 2012 to 2021) were included. Clinical variables evaluated included pathological complete response (pCR), ER, and tumor subtype. Radiological variables included tumor response according to RECIST criteria. Four breast radiologists reviewed breast MRI, annotated regions of interest and extracted radiomics features. Pure radiomics models and combined models (clinical-radiological, radiological-radiomics, and clinical-radiomics) were developed. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for each model, and the models were compared in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
Results
A total of 211 patients were included, the ER prevalence was of 11.34%. Patients with pCR or partial response to NAT and Luminal tumor subtype had a lower likelihood of developing ER (p = 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively). Two radiomics features were statistically significant associated with ER: F_cm_2.5D.energy and F_cm_2.5D.joint.entr. The AUC values for combined models were 0.77 (radiological-radiomics model), 0.68 (clinical-radiomics model), and 0.74 (clinical-radiological model). The radiological-radiomics model was significantly more accurate in predicting ER than the pure radiological and radiomics models (p<0.001 and p<0.03, respectively).
Conclusions
The radiological-radiomics model, combining radiomics features and RECIST criteria, showed the most promising results in predicting ER.
Clinical trial identification
ID 6081 26.10.2023.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Anna D'Angelo.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1988P - Enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab (P) outcomes outside clinical trials and biomarkers of benefit in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma: Analysis of the UNITE study
Presenter: Tanya Jindal
Session: Poster session 13
1989P - Efficacy of enfortumab vedotin (EV) in patients (pts) with (w) advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who have baseline neuropathy (N) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM): A UNITE study analysis
Presenter: Albert Jang
Session: Poster session 13
1990P - MRG002-HER2 ADC combined with pucotenlimab (a PD-1 inhibitor), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC): Preliminary results of a phase I/II study
Presenter: Chuanliang Cui
Session: Poster session 13
1992P - Real-world (RW) characteristics and outcomes in patients (pts) with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) treated with adjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)
Presenter: Hedyeh Ebrahimi
Session: Poster session 13
1993P - A randomized, phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eribulin mesylate in combination with atezolizumab compared to atezolizumab alone in subjects with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell urothelial cancer where cisplatin-based treatment is not an option
Presenter: Anishka D'Souza
Session: Poster session 13
1994P - Updated efficacy profile of the double antibody drug conjugate (DAD) phase I trial: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) plus enfortumab vedotin (EV) in ≥ second line in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster session 13
1995P - Insights into second-line (2L) systemic treatment (tx) receipt in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Results of a retrospective observational study in Germany
Presenter: Günter Niegisch
Session: Poster session 13
1996P - Primary analysis of post-marketing surveillance (PMS) data for avelumab maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with curatively unresectable urothelial carcinoma (UC) in Japan
Presenter: Eiji Kikuchi
Session: Poster session 13
1997P - Novel biomarker, ephrinB2 (B2), predicts resistance to treatment and poor overall survival (OS) metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Sarmad Sadeghi
Session: Poster session 13