Abstract 255P
Background
Breast cancer (BC) is a major global health concern. Neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) is standard for many cases, aiming to shrink tumors before surgery. Despite its effectiveness, some patients still experience early recurrence (ER), defined as relapse within the 3 years from the start of NAT, impacting their survival. Efforts are being made to predict who is at higher risk of ER using tools like breast MRI and radiomics, which extract information from images. Predicting ER after NAT remains a challenge. The study investigates the potential of radiomics analysis, combined with clinical and radiological variables, in predicting ER.
Methods
Patients with BC who underwent staging MRI, NAT, and surgery at our Center (from 2012 to 2021) were included. Clinical variables evaluated included pathological complete response (pCR), ER, and tumor subtype. Radiological variables included tumor response according to RECIST criteria. Four breast radiologists reviewed breast MRI, annotated regions of interest and extracted radiomics features. Pure radiomics models and combined models (clinical-radiological, radiological-radiomics, and clinical-radiomics) were developed. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for each model, and the models were compared in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
Results
A total of 211 patients were included, the ER prevalence was of 11.34%. Patients with pCR or partial response to NAT and Luminal tumor subtype had a lower likelihood of developing ER (p = 0.001 and p = 0.037, respectively). Two radiomics features were statistically significant associated with ER: F_cm_2.5D.energy and F_cm_2.5D.joint.entr. The AUC values for combined models were 0.77 (radiological-radiomics model), 0.68 (clinical-radiomics model), and 0.74 (clinical-radiological model). The radiological-radiomics model was significantly more accurate in predicting ER than the pure radiological and radiomics models (p<0.001 and p<0.03, respectively).
Conclusions
The radiological-radiomics model, combining radiomics features and RECIST criteria, showed the most promising results in predicting ER.
Clinical trial identification
ID 6081 26.10.2023.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Anna D'Angelo.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2019P - Disparities in urothelial carcinoma (UC) drug approval: Contrasting North America and Europe
Presenter: Jose Tapia
Session: Poster session 13
2020TiP - SOGUG-NEOWIN: A phase II, open-label, multi-centre trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of erdafitinib (ERDA) monotherapy and ERDA and cetrelimab (CET) as neoadjuvant treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and FGFR gene alterations
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster session 13
2022TiP - Stereotactic treatment with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and enfortumab vedotin: A phase I/II study for localized, cisplatin ineligible, muscle invasive bladder cancer (STAR-EV)
Presenter: Tian Zhang
Session: Poster session 13
2024TiP - NETOS: A personalized approach of neoadjuvant therapy, including INCB099280 monotherapy and bladder preservation, for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIBC) with ctDNA monitoring
Presenter: Valentina Tateo
Session: Poster session 13