Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 16

458P - Patterns of care and clinical outcomes of patients with glioblastoma in the United States from 2005-2020: A real-world analysis

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 16

Topics

Cancer Care Equity Principles and Health Economics;  Cancer Epidemiology

Tumour Site

Central Nervous System Malignancies

Presenters

Diya Jayram

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S406-S427. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1587

Authors

D. Jayram1, S. Bellur1, A. Ozair2, S. Ahmad1, L. Hodgson1, N. Frias Perez1, V. Podder1, M.A. Ganiyani1, M. Ahluwalia1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, Miami Cancer Institute - Baptist Health South Florida, 33176 - Miami/US
  • 2 Bloomberg School Of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 33176 - Miami/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 458P

Background

Survival for glioblastoma (GBM) remains low, with disparities affecting outcomes. Standard of care (SoC) includes surgery and adjuvant chemoradiation. This study explores demographics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of GBM patients (pts) in the United States (US).

Methods

We queried the US National Cancer Database for GBM pts diagnosed in 2005-2020 according to ESMO Guidance for Reporting Oncology Real-World (GROW). Trends were analyzed with descriptive statistics and X2-test between time periods: 2005-08, 2009-12, 2013-16, and 2017-20. Predictors of SoC receipt were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression. Median overall survival (mOS) estimated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models. Adjustment made using demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical factors. Outcomes reported as [Odds Ratio (OR)/Hazard Ratio (HR) 95% Confidence Interval (CI)] per STROBE guidelines.

Results

Of 104,697 GBM pts, 42.7% were female. 91.2% White, 5.7% Black, and 2.0% were Asian. 5.3% were Hispanic. Median age was 65 years (Interquartile Range: 57-73). Percentage of pts ≥ 65 years increased from 48.8% in 2005-08 to 54.0% in 2017-20. 56.5% of pts received SoC. SoC usage increased over time: 2009-12 (OR 1.26, CI 1.21-1.31, P<0.001) vs 2013-16 (OR 1.36, CI 1.31-1.42, P<0.001) vs 2017-20 (1.51, CI 1.45-1.57 P<0.001). Females (OR 0.91, CI 0.89-0.93 P<0.001), Black (OR 0.81, CI 0.77-0.86 P<0.001), and Hispanics (OR 0.91, CI 0.86-0.97, P=0.004) were less likely to receive SoC than males, White, and non-Hispanics. Privately insured were more likely to receive SoC than Medicare (OR 0.83, CI 0.80-0.87, P<0.001), Medicaid (OR 0.67, CI 0.64-0.71, P<0.001), and uninsured pts (OR 0.60, CI 0.55-0.64, P<0.001). SoC recipients had mOS of 14.6 months (CI 14.5-14.8) vs 4.8 (CI 4.7-4.9) for non-recipients (P<0.001). Compared to 2005-08, survival improved over time: 2017-20 (HR 0.84, CI 0.82-0.85, P<0.001) vs 2013-16 (HR 0.88, CI 0.86-0.89, P<0.001) vs 2009-12 (HR: 0.93, CI 0.91-0.94, P<0.001).

Conclusions

Receipt of SoC has risen with significant increase in survival. However, female, Black and Hispanic pts were less likely to receive SoC. Targeted efforts are warranted to mitigate disparities.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

M. Ahluwalia: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Seagan; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Bayer, Kiyatec, Insightec, GSK, Xoft, Nuvation, SDP Oncology, Apollomics, Prelude, Janssen, Voyager Therapeutics, Viewray, Caris Lifesciences, Pyramid Biosciences, Varian Medical Systems, Cairn Therapeutics, Anheart Therapeutics, Theraguix, Menarini Ricerche, Sumitomo Pharma Oncology, Autem therapeutics, GT Medical Technologies, Allovir, Equillium Bio, VBI Vaccines; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Modifi biosciences, Bugworks; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Mimivax, Cytodyn, MedInnovate Advisors LLC, Trisalus Lifesciences. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.