Abstract 2014P
Background
Combining multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with checkpoint inhibitors has shown synergistic effect in pts with in various solid tumors due to the immunomodulatory propriety of VEGFR inhibitors. We aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of the combination of cabozantinib plus durvalumab in advanced UC and VHs (NCT03824691). Herein we present the overall survival results of the interim analysis.
Methods
Patients affected by UC or non-urothelial carcinoma (VHs) recurred/progressed after at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy for metastatic disease have been treated with CABO 40 mg daily, orally, and DURVA 1500 mg IV, q28 days, until disease progression (PD, by RECIST 1.1) or onset of unacceptable toxicity. Response was evaluated by RECIST criteria v.1.1 every 8 wks. The primary endpoint of the study was OS. Secondary endpoints included safety (CTCAE v.4.03), objective response-rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS).
Results
As of February 10, 2024 data cut, 61 pts were enrolled and were evaluable for response; median follow-up was 26 months (interquartile 16.38-35.82), median age was 64 yrs and 21 pts (24%) had pure/predominant VHs: 10 (47.6%) squamous differentiation/sarcomatoid tumor, 4 (19%) adenocarcinoma, 5 (24%) small-cell neuroendocrine tumor, 1 (4.7%) clear-cell tumor, and 1 nested VH (4.7%). 12/61 (20% liver mets.12 pts (20%) had ≥ 2 prior lines of therapies. Median OS and PFS were 12.9 months (95% CI, 7.1-25.5) and 6 months (95% CI, 3.9-9.4), respectively. Confirmed ORR was 42.6% (range 30-55.9),18% CR in 11 pts. For VHs subgroup, median OS and PFS were 17.6 months (95% CI, 5.3-NR), and 5.3 (95% CI, 2.8-NR), respectively and ORR was 31%. At analysis, 9 pts remained on treatment. 2/61(3%) pts received EV as subsequent therapy. 38/61 pts had treatment-related adverse events of any grade and 25 (41%) had grade 3/4.
Conclusions
CABO in combination with DURVA suggests promising prolonged survival and acceptable tolerability in pts with advanced UC, especially those with VHs. Further randomized controlled studies will be required in a larger patient population.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03824691.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Patrizia Giannatempo.
Funding
AstraZeneca, Ipsen.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1987P - TROP-2 as a promising ADC target in penile squamous cell carcinoma that promotes cell proliferation by activating AKT through PKCα pathway
Presenter: Yi Tang
Session: Poster session 13
1988P - Enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab (P) outcomes outside clinical trials and biomarkers of benefit in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma: Analysis of the UNITE study
Presenter: Tanya Jindal
Session: Poster session 13
1989P - Efficacy of enfortumab vedotin (EV) in patients (pts) with (w) advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who have baseline neuropathy (N) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM): A UNITE study analysis
Presenter: Albert Jang
Session: Poster session 13
1990P - MRG002-HER2 ADC combined with pucotenlimab (a PD-1 inhibitor), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC): Preliminary results of a phase I/II study
Presenter: Chuanliang Cui
Session: Poster session 13
1992P - Real-world (RW) characteristics and outcomes in patients (pts) with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) treated with adjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)
Presenter: Hedyeh Ebrahimi
Session: Poster session 13
1993P - A randomized, phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eribulin mesylate in combination with atezolizumab compared to atezolizumab alone in subjects with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell urothelial cancer where cisplatin-based treatment is not an option
Presenter: Anishka D'Souza
Session: Poster session 13
1994P - Updated efficacy profile of the double antibody drug conjugate (DAD) phase I trial: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) plus enfortumab vedotin (EV) in ≥ second line in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster session 13
1995P - Insights into second-line (2L) systemic treatment (tx) receipt in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Results of a retrospective observational study in Germany
Presenter: Günter Niegisch
Session: Poster session 13
1996P - Primary analysis of post-marketing surveillance (PMS) data for avelumab maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with curatively unresectable urothelial carcinoma (UC) in Japan
Presenter: Eiji Kikuchi
Session: Poster session 13