Abstract 2014P
Background
Combining multitargeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with checkpoint inhibitors has shown synergistic effect in pts with in various solid tumors due to the immunomodulatory propriety of VEGFR inhibitors. We aim to investigate the safety and efficacy of the combination of cabozantinib plus durvalumab in advanced UC and VHs (NCT03824691). Herein we present the overall survival results of the interim analysis.
Methods
Patients affected by UC or non-urothelial carcinoma (VHs) recurred/progressed after at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy for metastatic disease have been treated with CABO 40 mg daily, orally, and DURVA 1500 mg IV, q28 days, until disease progression (PD, by RECIST 1.1) or onset of unacceptable toxicity. Response was evaluated by RECIST criteria v.1.1 every 8 wks. The primary endpoint of the study was OS. Secondary endpoints included safety (CTCAE v.4.03), objective response-rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS).
Results
As of February 10, 2024 data cut, 61 pts were enrolled and were evaluable for response; median follow-up was 26 months (interquartile 16.38-35.82), median age was 64 yrs and 21 pts (24%) had pure/predominant VHs: 10 (47.6%) squamous differentiation/sarcomatoid tumor, 4 (19%) adenocarcinoma, 5 (24%) small-cell neuroendocrine tumor, 1 (4.7%) clear-cell tumor, and 1 nested VH (4.7%). 12/61 (20% liver mets.12 pts (20%) had ≥ 2 prior lines of therapies. Median OS and PFS were 12.9 months (95% CI, 7.1-25.5) and 6 months (95% CI, 3.9-9.4), respectively. Confirmed ORR was 42.6% (range 30-55.9),18% CR in 11 pts. For VHs subgroup, median OS and PFS were 17.6 months (95% CI, 5.3-NR), and 5.3 (95% CI, 2.8-NR), respectively and ORR was 31%. At analysis, 9 pts remained on treatment. 2/61(3%) pts received EV as subsequent therapy. 38/61 pts had treatment-related adverse events of any grade and 25 (41%) had grade 3/4.
Conclusions
CABO in combination with DURVA suggests promising prolonged survival and acceptable tolerability in pts with advanced UC, especially those with VHs. Further randomized controlled studies will be required in a larger patient population.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03824691.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Patrizia Giannatempo.
Funding
AstraZeneca, Ipsen.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2019P - Disparities in urothelial carcinoma (UC) drug approval: Contrasting North America and Europe
Presenter: Jose Tapia
Session: Poster session 13
2020TiP - SOGUG-NEOWIN: A phase II, open-label, multi-centre trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of erdafitinib (ERDA) monotherapy and ERDA and cetrelimab (CET) as neoadjuvant treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and FGFR gene alterations
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster session 13
2022TiP - Stereotactic treatment with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and enfortumab vedotin: A phase I/II study for localized, cisplatin ineligible, muscle invasive bladder cancer (STAR-EV)
Presenter: Tian Zhang
Session: Poster session 13
2024TiP - NETOS: A personalized approach of neoadjuvant therapy, including INCB099280 monotherapy and bladder preservation, for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIBC) with ctDNA monitoring
Presenter: Valentina Tateo
Session: Poster session 13