Abstract 1094P
Background
NeoIT with anti-PD-1 (PD1) is now a standard of care for patients (pts) with resectable stage IIIB–D melanoma. Although pathological response is predictive of recurrence, this variable alone cannot accurately identify those pts who will recur, particularly non-responders. We sought to build a recurrence risk assessment tool based on pts demographics, disease characteristics, pathological and imaging data.
Methods
Pts with resectable stage IIIB–D melanoma treated with PD1-based neoIT were included. Pts demographics, disease characteristics, blood parameters, pathological and imaging data at baseline (BL) and post-treatment (post-Tx), and clinical outcomes were analysed. A penalised multivariable logistic regression model was built to predict recurrence and a tool (NeoRisk) predicting the likelihood of recurrence for individual patients was generated.
Results
164 pts who underwent surgery post PD1-based NeoIT and had at least 6 months of follow-up were included; training cohort (n=114; 16 recurrences, 14%) and validation cohort (n=50; 7 recurrences, 14%). After the analysis of >50 variables, the combination of 4 variables accurately predicted recurrence (training cohort, AUC=0.91; validation cohort, AUC=0.93): 1) % of viable tumour cells in the tumour bed post-Tx (AOR=2.55, p=0.0016); 2) density of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) post-Tx (absence, mild, moderate, marked; e.g. marked vs absence, OR=0.39, p=0.0115); 3) difference in the % of fibrosis from BL to post-Tx (OR=0.69, p=0.0531); and 4) % tumour change from BL by RECIST (OR=2.06, p=0.0043). NeoRisk can be used to predict recurrence for individual patients; for example, Patient A with 55% of viable tumour cells and mild TILs post-Tx, 0% and 2% of fibrosis at BL and post-Tx, respectively, and 13% increase of tumour size from BL, has a risk of recurrence of 82%; while Patient B, with the same % of viable tumour cells, but moderate TILs post-Tx, 0% and 35% of fibrosis at BL and post-Tx, respectively, and 12% decrease of tumour size from BL, has a lower risk of recurrence of 20%.
Conclusions
NeoRisk can accurately predict recurrence after NeoIT, which may help tailor adjuvant treatment and radiological surveillance interval based on the predicted risk of recurrence for individual patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Melanoma Institute Australia.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
I. Pires da Silva: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel Support: BMS, Roche; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD. R. Rawson: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD. M.S. Carlino: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Consultant Advisor: MSD, BMS, Novartis, Amgen, Oncosec, Merck, Sanofi, Ideaya, Pierre Fabre, Eisai, Nektar, Regeneron. A.M. Menzies: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, advisory board: BMS, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Pierre Fabre, QBiotics. R.A. Scolyer: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: SkylineDx BV, IO Biotech ApS, MetaOptima Technology Inc, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Evaxion, Provectus Biopharmaceuticals Australia, Qbiotics, Novartis, Merck Sharp & Dohme, NeraCare, AMGEN Inc, Bristol Myers Squibb, Myriad Genetics, GSK. G.V. Long: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultant Advisor: Agenus Inc, Amgen Inc, Array Biopharma Inc, AstraZeneca UK Limited, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, BioNTech SE, Boehringer Ingelheim Ingelheim International GmbH, Bristol Myers Squibb, Evaxion Biotech A/S, Hexal AG, Highlight Therapeutics S.L, IOBiotech, Immunocore Ireland Limited, Innovent Bioilogics USA Inc, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis Pharma AG, PHMR Limited, Pierre Fabre, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc, Scancell Limited, SkylineDX B.V; Non-Financial Interests, Principal Investigator, GL is PI on over 30 clinical trials: GL is PI on over 30 clinical trials. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1112P - Immunotherapy after progression to double immunotherapy: Pembrolizumab and Lenvatinib versus conventional chemotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma after failure of PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibition
Presenter: Dimitrios Ziogas
Session: Poster session 04
1113P - A machine learning model based on computed tomography radiomics to predict prognosis in subjects with stage IV melanoma
Presenter: Maria Teresa Maccallini
Session: Poster session 04
1114P - Deciphering unresectable in-transit metastasis in melanoma: Multi-modal and longitudinal insights
Presenter: Giuseppe Tarantino
Session: Poster session 04
1115P - Multiomics clustering of patients with cutaneous melanoma to reveal survival trends based on tumor immune evasion features
Presenter: Adeliya Leleytner
Session: Poster session 04
1116P - Application of the Scottish inflammatory prognostic score to the south-east Scotland cancer network real-world melanoma cohort
Presenter: Karim El-Shakankery
Session: Poster session 04
1117P - Intratumoral microbiota is associated with prognosis in Chinese patients with skin melanoma
Presenter: Hang Jiang
Session: Poster session 04
1118P - Immunological alterations during neoadjuvant BRAF/MEK inhibition in patients with prior unresectable regionally advanced melanoma: Translational analysis from the REDUCTOR trial
Presenter: Femke Burgers
Session: Poster session 04
1119P - Genomic and transcriptomic predictors of resistance to anti-PD1 monotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Wenya Wang
Session: Poster session 04
1120P - Tumoral and peripheral immunophenotype of patients with stage II/III melanoma undergoing adjuvant immunotherapy following tumor resection
Presenter: Maria Ascierto
Session: Poster session 04
1121P - Artificial Intelligence to predict BRAF mutational status from whole slide images in melanoma
Presenter: Céline Bossard
Session: Poster session 04