Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 04

1116P - Application of the Scottish inflammatory prognostic score to the south-east Scotland cancer network real-world melanoma cohort

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 04

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Melanoma

Presenters

Karim El-Shakankery

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S712-S748. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1597

Authors

K.H. El-Shakankery1, S.S.P. Low1, A. Christie1, E.R. Brown1, M. stares2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, ECC - Edinburgh Cancer Centre - SCAN, EH4 2XU - Edinburgh/GB
  • 2 Oncology, Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, EH4 2XR - Edinburgh/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1116P

Background

The Scottish Inflammatory Prognostic Score (SIPS) has been shown to predict survival in patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy. SIPS uses serum albumin and neutrophil measurements, routinely collected prior to treatment commencement, to generate a score of 0-2 (Table). We aimed to assess the prognostic utility of SIPS in patients with unresectable/metastatic melanoma treated with first-line pembrolizumab.

Methods

All patients treated with first line pembrolizumab for unresectable/metastatic cutaneous melanoma at a Scottish Regional Cancer Centre between 2013-2020 were included. Data extracted comprised patient demographics, oncological diagnosis and staging, first-line metastatic treatment details, radiological responses, and mortality status. Patients were stratified by SIPS. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were defined as the time from cycle 1, day 1 pembrolizumab monotherapy to progression or death (from any cause) respectively, or censorship. The relationship between SIPS and survival outcomes was evaluated.

Results

145 patients were included. Median age was 71 (range 32-90) years and 58% were male. The minimum follow-up time of censored patients was 14.7 months. 92 (63%), 37 (26%) and 16 (11%) of patients were SIPS 0, 1 or 2 respectively. SIPS stratified both PFS and OS (both p7.5 x109/L OR Albumin

Conclusions

As in NSCLC, SIPS may predict survival outcomes in patients with cutaneous melanoma, treated with pembrolizumab. In those with SIPS 2 we suggest careful consideration as to the merits of pembrolizumab therapy when discussing this option with patients. SIPS warrants further investigation, both through external validation in melanoma patients receiving pembrolizumab, and applicability to other treatment options, such as ipilimumab/nivolumab.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.