Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 04

1112P - Immunotherapy after progression to double immunotherapy: Pembrolizumab and Lenvatinib versus conventional chemotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma after failure of PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibition

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 04

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Melanoma

Presenters

Dimitrios Ziogas

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S712-S748. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1597

Authors

D.C. Ziogas1, G. Lyrarakis1, M. Liontos2, A. Anastasopoulou1, S. Bouros1, A. Gkoufa1, P. Diamantopoulos1, H. Gogas3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Internal Medicine Department, Laiko General Hospital of Athens, 115 27 - Athens/GR
  • 2 Oncology Unit, Department Of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, 115 28 - Athens/GR
  • 3 First Department Of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens - School of Medicine, 115 27 - Athens/GR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1112P

Background

PD-1 inhibition as monotherapy following by CTLA-4 inhibition in progressive disease or as upfront co-inhibition have drastically improved the prognosis of metastatic melanoma. Still many patients develop primary/acquired resistance to both agents, relapse soon and survive less. For many years, conventional chemotherapy (CC)was the standard of care for these patients. Recently the phase II LEAP004 trial supported that pembrolizumab/lenvatinib could overcome anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 refractoriness.

Methods

In absence of any prospective comparison in this frail population, we retrospectively debate here the LEAP004 proposed combination (pembrolizumab 200mg with lenvatinib, at a dose of 10mg, due to its known toxicity) with CC (carboplatin 4AUC and dacarbazine 850mg/m2 Q3W) in real-world melanoma patients who relapsed to both ICIs, either in combinatorial or sequential setting, between July 2022 and January 2024. Patient and disease characteristics as well as treatment and safety outcomes were recorded. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

84 patients were included in the final analysis (pembro/lenva, n=39 vs CC, n=45; males: 33.3% vs 46.7%, respectively). Median age was 67(45-87) and 64(34-87) years. The distribution of their metastatic sites was comparable, including 12.8% and 20% with brain involvement. Most patients had a PS<2 (69.9% vs 56.5%), increased LDH (71.8% vs 84.4%), BRAF-wild status (82.1% vs 84.8%) and received>=2 previous therapies (61.5% vs 53.3%). Median follow-up was 18 months. ORR was 23.1% and 11.1% in pembro/lenva and CC groups (P<0.0001). mPFS was 4.8 and 3.8 months (HR[95%CI]: 0.57 [0.36-0.92]; P=0.017) and mOS was 14.2 and 7.8 months(HR[95%CI]:0.39 [0.22-0.69]; P=0.0009), for pembro/lenva and CC arms, respectively. Grade 3-5 TRAEs were documented in 48.7% and 75.6% of patients (P=0.034), leading to discontinuation in 10.3% and 17.8% of cases, respectively.

Conclusions

This is the first comparative study in patients with metastatic melanoma refractory to PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibition and showed significantly longer outcomes in cases treated with pembro/lenva versus CC.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

D.C. Ziogas: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS, Ipsen, Pierre Fabre, Gilead, Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche. H. Gogas: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, BMS, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD, BMS, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Steering Committee Member: Amgen, Replimmune; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Amgen, MSD, BMS, Replimmune, Iovance, Bayer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: BMS, Pfizer, Lilly, Pierre Fabre, AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.