Abstract 701P
Background
Four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEPx4) or etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin (VIPx4), are the standard 1L treatments for Stage IIIB/IIIC NSGCTs. Limited data exists comparing outcomes between BEPx4 and VIPx4 in pts who subsequently received HDCT. We aimed to address this gap by pooling data from four high-volume referral centers.
Methods
We collated data from four high-volume referral centers. We included adult pts diagnosed with NSGCTs who underwent either BEPx4 or VIPx4 as 1L chemotherapy followed by HDCT for recurrent NSGCT between January 1, 2010, and January 1, 2024. Differences among pts groups were assessed using the Fisher's exact test for qualitative variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for quantitative variables. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.
Results
58 pts across four institutions met the specified criteria. Of these, 37 (63.8%) pts received BEPx4, and 21 (36.2%) pts received VIPx4 as the 1L chemotherapy. Median age at diagnosis was 27 years (range, 18-51), and 38 (65.5%) pts identified themselves as white. 7 (12.1%) pts had Stage IIIB, 45 (77.6%) had Stage IIIC, and 6 (10.3%) were unstageable. 33 (56.9%) pts underwent HDCT following recurrence after 1L chemotherapy, and 18 (31.0%) received HDCT in the 3rd-line. The median follow-up time after the 1L chemotherapy was 44.3 months. Median RFS following 1L chemotherapy was 23.0 and 24.9 months among pts who received BEPx4 and VIPx4, respectively (HR= 0.84, 95% CI [0.40, 1.75], P=0.637). Median OS following 1L BEPx4 and VIPx4 were 114.6 and 57.7 months, respectively (HR=0.52, 95% CI [0.20, 1.32], P=0.170). Post-transplant relapse rate among pts who received HDCT in the 2nd and 3rd line was 58% and 56% (P=0.99).
Conclusions
In this multicenter comparison of 1L chemotherapy regimens in pts with NSGCT necessitating HDCT due to recurrence, no significant disparities in RFS and OS emerged between BEPx4 and VIPx4. These results underscore the importance of considering factors beyond efficacy, such as regimen safety and toxicity, in selecting 1L chemotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Alexander Chehrazi-Raffle.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1192P - Optimizing lung cancer screening: Independent verification of an AI/ML computer-aided detection and characterization software as medical device
Presenter: Sylvain Bodard
Session: Poster session 09
1194P - Development of a novel artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm to detect pulmonary nodules on chest radiography
Presenter: Mitsunori Higuchi
Session: Poster session 09
1195P - Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) screening in Li Fraumeni syndrome for early cancer diagnosis: The SIGNIFIED project
Presenter: Elena Cojocaru
Session: Poster session 09
1196P - Organoid growth-based oncological sensitivity test (OncoSensi) for predicting adjuvant therapy outcomes in ovarian cancer patients
Presenter: Dong Woo Lee
Session: Poster session 09
1197P - Ex vivo basket study reports patient-specific sensitivity to carboplatin versus cisplatin in lung, ovarian and bladder cancer
Presenter: Debbie Robbrecht
Session: Poster session 09
1198P - Analytical validation of an NGS panel-based ecDNA detection device for use as a clinical trial assay for the POTENTIATE clinical study of the novel CHK1 inhibitor, BBI-355
Presenter: Pontis Julien
Session: Poster session 09