Abstract 701P
Background
Four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEPx4) or etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin (VIPx4), are the standard 1L treatments for Stage IIIB/IIIC NSGCTs. Limited data exists comparing outcomes between BEPx4 and VIPx4 in pts who subsequently received HDCT. We aimed to address this gap by pooling data from four high-volume referral centers.
Methods
We collated data from four high-volume referral centers. We included adult pts diagnosed with NSGCTs who underwent either BEPx4 or VIPx4 as 1L chemotherapy followed by HDCT for recurrent NSGCT between January 1, 2010, and January 1, 2024. Differences among pts groups were assessed using the Fisher's exact test for qualitative variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for quantitative variables. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.
Results
58 pts across four institutions met the specified criteria. Of these, 37 (63.8%) pts received BEPx4, and 21 (36.2%) pts received VIPx4 as the 1L chemotherapy. Median age at diagnosis was 27 years (range, 18-51), and 38 (65.5%) pts identified themselves as white. 7 (12.1%) pts had Stage IIIB, 45 (77.6%) had Stage IIIC, and 6 (10.3%) were unstageable. 33 (56.9%) pts underwent HDCT following recurrence after 1L chemotherapy, and 18 (31.0%) received HDCT in the 3rd-line. The median follow-up time after the 1L chemotherapy was 44.3 months. Median RFS following 1L chemotherapy was 23.0 and 24.9 months among pts who received BEPx4 and VIPx4, respectively (HR= 0.84, 95% CI [0.40, 1.75], P=0.637). Median OS following 1L BEPx4 and VIPx4 were 114.6 and 57.7 months, respectively (HR=0.52, 95% CI [0.20, 1.32], P=0.170). Post-transplant relapse rate among pts who received HDCT in the 2nd and 3rd line was 58% and 56% (P=0.99).
Conclusions
In this multicenter comparison of 1L chemotherapy regimens in pts with NSGCT necessitating HDCT due to recurrence, no significant disparities in RFS and OS emerged between BEPx4 and VIPx4. These results underscore the importance of considering factors beyond efficacy, such as regimen safety and toxicity, in selecting 1L chemotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Alexander Chehrazi-Raffle.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
202P - eIF4E inhibition exhibits anti-tumor activity and re-sensitizes acquired resistant KRAS G12C NSCLC to KRAS inhibitors
Presenter: Andrew Truong
Session: Poster session 09
203P - An innovative evidence-based laboratory medicine (EBLM) test to help doctors in multi-cancer early detection (MCED)
Presenter: Jose D Santotoribio
Session: Poster session 09
204P - Assessing biomarker testing awareness among patients and caregivers in NSCLC through an interdisciplinary global survey
Presenter: Rodrigo Paredes
Session: Poster session 09
205P - Detection and diagnosis of lung cancer by electronic nose analysis of exhaled breath: A multi-center prospective observational study
Presenter: Alessandra Buma
Session: Poster session 09
206P - Unveiling the link: How metabolic syndrome drives endometrial cancer progression
Presenter: Lirong Zhai
Session: Poster session 09
Resources:
Abstract
207P - Associations of diabetic background retinopathy and ER+ breast cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study
Presenter: Shu Wang
Session: Poster session 09
208P - Role of plasma exosomes in crosstalk between immune system and hereditary ovarian cancer: Opportunity or challenge?
Presenter: Daniele Fanale
Session: Poster session 09
209P - A novel method for early evaluation of drug-specific predictive biomarker
Presenter: Gal Dinstag
Session: Poster session 09
210P - Therapeutic implications of phosphoproteomics in molecular cancer diagnostics
Presenter: Annika Schneider
Session: Poster session 09
211P - GynePDX: A new platform of preclinical models for endometrial and ovarian cancers
Presenter: Melek Denizli
Session: Poster session 09