Abstract 701P
Background
Four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin (BEPx4) or etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin (VIPx4), are the standard 1L treatments for Stage IIIB/IIIC NSGCTs. Limited data exists comparing outcomes between BEPx4 and VIPx4 in pts who subsequently received HDCT. We aimed to address this gap by pooling data from four high-volume referral centers.
Methods
We collated data from four high-volume referral centers. We included adult pts diagnosed with NSGCTs who underwent either BEPx4 or VIPx4 as 1L chemotherapy followed by HDCT for recurrent NSGCT between January 1, 2010, and January 1, 2024. Differences among pts groups were assessed using the Fisher's exact test for qualitative variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for quantitative variables. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test.
Results
58 pts across four institutions met the specified criteria. Of these, 37 (63.8%) pts received BEPx4, and 21 (36.2%) pts received VIPx4 as the 1L chemotherapy. Median age at diagnosis was 27 years (range, 18-51), and 38 (65.5%) pts identified themselves as white. 7 (12.1%) pts had Stage IIIB, 45 (77.6%) had Stage IIIC, and 6 (10.3%) were unstageable. 33 (56.9%) pts underwent HDCT following recurrence after 1L chemotherapy, and 18 (31.0%) received HDCT in the 3rd-line. The median follow-up time after the 1L chemotherapy was 44.3 months. Median RFS following 1L chemotherapy was 23.0 and 24.9 months among pts who received BEPx4 and VIPx4, respectively (HR= 0.84, 95% CI [0.40, 1.75], P=0.637). Median OS following 1L BEPx4 and VIPx4 were 114.6 and 57.7 months, respectively (HR=0.52, 95% CI [0.20, 1.32], P=0.170). Post-transplant relapse rate among pts who received HDCT in the 2nd and 3rd line was 58% and 56% (P=0.99).
Conclusions
In this multicenter comparison of 1L chemotherapy regimens in pts with NSGCT necessitating HDCT due to recurrence, no significant disparities in RFS and OS emerged between BEPx4 and VIPx4. These results underscore the importance of considering factors beyond efficacy, such as regimen safety and toxicity, in selecting 1L chemotherapy.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Alexander Chehrazi-Raffle.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
212P - BRGSF-HIS mice as a predictive tool for safety assessment of biologics
Presenter: Kader Thiam
Session: Poster session 09
213P - Constructing a high-definition patient-digital twin (PDT) in treatment-naïve women with advanced cancer
Presenter: Leonardo Garma
Session: Poster session 09
215P - Detection of MUTYH for the prognosis and chemotherapy responsiveness of patients with non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Chi Wai Wong
Session: Poster session 09
216P - β-catenin is a potential prognostic biomarker in uterine sarcoma
Presenter: Ying Cai
Session: Poster session 09
218P - Exploiting a unique glycosaminoglycan for novel pan-cancer therapies and diagnostics
Presenter: Mette Agerbæk
Session: Poster session 09
219P - The landscape and prognostic impact of germline HLA-A subtypes in patients with advanced solid cancers
Presenter: Kyrillus Shohdy
Session: Poster session 09
220P - The role of fucosyltransferase 1 (FUT1) in CRC as a putative prognostic and predictive biomarker
Presenter: Lorenz Pammer
Session: Poster session 09
221P - ANGPTL4's role in cancer: A meta analysis and bioinformatics exploration
Presenter: Osama Younis
Session: Poster session 09
222P - Artificial intelligence (AI) based prognostication from baseline computed tomography (CT) scans in a phase III advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) trial
Presenter: Omar Khan
Session: Poster session 09