Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Mini oral session: Policy and preventive strategies

1542MO - Mapping the scale of off-label use in oncology: An important step in harmonising access

Date

16 Sep 2024

Session

Mini oral session: Policy and preventive strategies

Topics

Fundamentals of Cancer Care Organisation;  Targeted Therapy;  Cancer Care Equity Principles and Health Economics;  Cancer Research

Tumour Site

Presenters

Hans Timmer

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S937-S961. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1606

Authors

H.J.L. Timmer1, A.H. Huisman2, L. Fagereng3, H. Gelderblom4, S.B. van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani5

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2333 ZA - Leiden/NL
  • 2 Inpatient Drugs, Health Insurers The Netherlands, 3708 JE - Zeist/NL
  • 3 Institute For Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 - Oslo/NO
  • 4 Department Of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2300 RC - Leiden/NL
  • 5 Department Of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Centre/, Medical Department, CZ Health Insurance, 2333 ZA - Leiden/Tilburg/NL

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 1542MO

Background

Off-label use of anticancer drugs is often considered for treating rare tumours or advanced stages of disease when standard treatments are exhausted or ineffective. International reports suggest that 13%–71% of cancer patients receive at least one line of off-label chemotherapy. However, understanding the extent of off-label use in oncology remains limited. By mapping off-label indications, we can enhance our understanding of clinical needs, improve pathways for evidence assessment and facilitate access through reimbursement.

Methods

The off-label claim codes, approved by Dutch Healthcare Insurers for reimbursement without prior authorisation were analysed. Non-oncology ID- codes were excluded. The codes were categorised based on solid tumour or haemato-oncological indication, paediatric or adult indication, monotherapy/combination therapy, type and number of unique drugs, and data the positive reimbursement decision was based on (e.g. literature).

Results

Approximately 30% of the reimbursed oncological indications in the Netherlands are off-label. These indications consist largely of chemotherapy, (66% of total indications) especially in the treatment of solid tumours (48%). However, off-label use is also prevalent in other types of treatment, e.g. tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), endocrine therapy and monoclonal antibodies (respectively 9%, 7% and 5%). Off-label use is common in treatment of children, with 26% of all indications being paediatric. Table: 1542MO

Solid tumours Haemato-oncology Both Total
Oncological off-label indications 212 110 5 327
Indications divided based on type of drug
Chemotherapy 158 53 5 216
Monotherapy 136 52 3 191
Combination 22 1 2 25
TKI 8 23 0 31
Endocrine therapy 22 0 0 22
Monoclonal antibody 5 12 0 17
Other 19 22 0 41
Number of unique drugs 48 24 4 76
Type of treatment
Monotherapy 179 100 3 282
Combination1 33 10 2 45
Indications divided based on age
Adult 175 62 1 238
Paediatric 37 44 4 85
Both 0 4 0 4
Positive reimbursement decision based on
Established use2 100 41 3 144
Guideline 47 50 2 99
Literature 49 15 0 64
Consultation with medical society 15 5 0 20

1. Different types of drug (e.g. TKI + chemotherapy)2. Data for reimbursement decision unknown

Conclusions

Our study underscores the scale and necessity of evaluating and reimbursing off-label use of oncology drugs, to provide equal access to effective treatment. This is particularly crucial for indications that may not be commercially viable for companies to pursue regulatory approvals due to small patient numbers or patent expiration. Reimbursement of off-label use enhances equitable access while also providing affordable and additional treatment options for patients.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Horizon Europe Cancer Mission, EC grant agreement no. 101104269 (PRIME-ROSE).

Disclosure

H. Gelderblom: Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Deciphera, Cytovation; Financial Interests, Institutional, Coordinating PI: Boehringer Ingelheim, AmMax Bio, Debiopharm, Abbisko. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.