Abstract 1543MO
Background
Clinical trial results are crucial to understand the benefit-harm profile of new drugs. Extrapolating these findings to patients beyond the trial population lacks certainty, and patients could experience more intense side effects. The objective was to analyze the accordance between trial and target populations for cancer drugs approved in the US, EU, and Switzerland.
Methods
We used public databases (FDA, EMA, Swissmedic) to identify all new cancer drugs approved between 2014 and 2023 in the US, EU, and Switzerland. The following patient characteristics were extracted from the pivotal trial population and target population (clinicaltrials.gov, approval labels): Age, disease severity (e.g., locally advanced, metastatic), disease subtype (e.g., mutations), prior therapy (e.g., prior treatment lines). A drug can have multiple pivotal trials; each trial was assessed separately. Using descriptive statistics, we assessed the concordance between trial and target populations for the outlined patient characteristics.
Results
79 cancer drugs were approved in the US, EU, and Switzerland 2014-2023. When comparing patient population in pivotal trials and approval label, the FDA approved for 56/79 (71%) drugs a broader target population compared to the trial population, mostly in terms of age (38%), followed by prior therapy (35%), severity (23%), disease subtype (15%). The EMA approved for 44/79 (56%) drugs a broader target population, mostly in terms of prior therapy (30%), followed by severity (19%), disease subtype (16%), age (4%). Swissmedic approved for 39/79 (49%) drugs a broader target population, mostly in terms of prior therapy (24%), followed by age (19%), disease subtype (16%), severity (9%). For 41/79 (52%), 36/79 (46%), and 48/79 (61%) cancer drugs, the FDA, EMA, and Swissmedic, respectively, were more restrictive in the approved target population compared to the trial population, in approx 1/3 of the cases due to prior therapy and 1/4 due to severity.
Conclusions
Many cancer drugs - especially in the US but also in the EU and Switzerland - were approved for patients outside the trial population. Approval bodies should devote particular scrutiny to close the gap between trial and target populations for cancer drugs.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF).
Disclosure
K.N. Vokinger: Financial Interests, Funding: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF). M. Serra-Burriel: Financial Interests, Funding: EU Horizon Grants. A. Kesselheim: Financial Interests, Funding: Arnold Ventures. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1539MO - Oncologists’ voices in time of crisis: Findings from the ESMO Resilience Task Force survey series on how members can be helped and supported – A qualitative analysis
Presenter: Claire Hardy
Session: Mini oral session: Policy and preventive strategies
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
1540MO - The patient voice: An analysis of real-world data using the recurrent respiratory papillomatosis foundation/CoRDS patient registry (RRPF/CoRDS)
Presenter: Sara Pai
Session: Mini oral session: Policy and preventive strategies
Resources:
Abstract
Webcast
1541MO - Leadership roles in oncology: Gender is still a barrier. Results from the new ESMO Women for Oncology Committee authorship and monitoring studies
Presenter: Helena Linardou
Session: Mini oral session: Policy and preventive strategies
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Invited Discussant 1539MO, 1540MO and 1541MO
Presenter: Christine Chomienne
Session: Mini oral session: Policy and preventive strategies
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
1542MO - Mapping the scale of off-label use in oncology: An important step in harmonising access
Presenter: Hans Timmer
Session: Mini oral session: Policy and preventive strategies
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
1544MO - Clinical trial design and treatment effects: A meta-analysis of randomized-controlled and single-arm trials supporting 437 FDA approvals of cancer drugs and indications
Presenter: Julia Caroline Michaeli
Session: Mini oral session: Policy and preventive strategies
Resources:
Abstract
Webcast
Invited Discussant 1542MO, 1543MO and 1544MO
Presenter: Paolo G. Casali
Session: Mini oral session: Policy and preventive strategies
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
LBA64 - Outcomes of BRCA and in-house homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing in women with ovarian and breast cancer: A multicentre registry study
Presenter: Kyrillus Shohdy
Session: Mini oral session: Policy and preventive strategies
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
1545MO - Personalised cancer prevention programme (Interception): A cost analysis to inform public policy decision-making
Presenter: Farah Erdogan
Session: Mini oral session: Policy and preventive strategies
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Invited Discussant LBA64 and 1545MO
Presenter: Judith Balmaña
Session: Mini oral session: Policy and preventive strategies
Resources:
Slides
Webcast