Abstract 1499P
Background
To demonstrate the status and differences in knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of lung cancer palliative care (LCPC) management, and to measure patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in cancer pain management in of China.
Methods
A questionnaire on LCPC management was used in this study, which involved a total of 2093 participants from 706 hospitals in China. Seven major components make up the questionnaire, including chi-square tests or Fisher exact probabilities to measure the differences in KAP between hospitals grades. Comparing distributions of ordered data between groups was done using the Kruskal-Wallis H test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Multiple choice questions use multiple response cross analysis. Correlation was evaluated by the Spearman correlation coefficient.
Results
84.2% participants believed that anti-tumor therapy is equally important as palliative care. The satisfaction rate of participants from grade 3 hospitals, which was significantly higher than that of grade 2 and grade 1 hospitals (χ2=27.402, P=0.002). The most common symptoms requiring LCPC was pain. The major barriers toward to LCPC were “Patients and families are concerned about the safety of long-term use of palliative care related drugs”. The most common reasons for the use of PCA treatment were 31.1% participants thought “Patients with systemic application of large doses of opioids or adverse reactions to opioids that cannot be tolerated”. The top three barriers toward PCA treatment of cancer pain were (i) worry about adverse reactions of drug overdose, (ii) worry about opioid addiction, and (iii) increase of patients' economic burden. In the past 24 months, 33.9% of the participants had not participated in online or offline training related to palliative care of lung cancer.
Conclusions
Chinese healthcare workers are in need of training for lung cancer palliative care and, in particular, for controlling cancer pain symptoms.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1584P - Association of travel burden (TB) with colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes in resource-limited settings (RLS)
Presenter: Saquib Banday
Session: Poster session 10
1585P - Performance status restrictions in clinical trials leading to US food and drug administration (FDA) drug approval: A cross-sectional study of a decade (2014-2023)
Presenter: Giovanni Maria Iannantuono
Session: Poster session 10
1586P - Current status of breast cancer: A comparative analysis between developed and developing countries
Presenter: Ana Isabel Martin Quesada
Session: Poster session 10
1587P - As seen through Hollywood’s lens: Cancer in movies, 2010-2020
Presenter: David Benjamin
Session: Poster session 10
1588P - Interventions to improve Herpes Zoster (HZ) vaccination rate among cancer outpatients receiving systemic treatments: A single-center real-world experience
Presenter: Sara Di Bella
Session: Poster session 10
1589P - Ramping up phase I trial recruitment: Defining potential barriers and disparities
Presenter: Burak Aktas
Session: Poster session 10
1590P - Prevalence and impact on survival of presentation to the emergency room of cancer patients: A retrospective study on real-life data
Presenter: Sonia Priou
Session: Poster session 10
1591P - Development and economic trends in new anticancer therapies licensed in the UK from 2020 to 2024
Presenter: Geetin Majhail
Session: Poster session 10
1592P - Awareness and interest of oncology professionals in sex and gender differences in cancer risk and outcome: Analysis of an ESMO Gender Medicine Task Force survey
Presenter: Berna C. Özdemir
Session: Poster session 10
1593P - Factors associated with multiple general practitioner consultations before cancer diagnosis in adolescents and young adults: A cohort study in Australia
Presenter: Jeremy Lewin
Session: Poster session 10