Abstract 1499P
Background
To demonstrate the status and differences in knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of lung cancer palliative care (LCPC) management, and to measure patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in cancer pain management in of China.
Methods
A questionnaire on LCPC management was used in this study, which involved a total of 2093 participants from 706 hospitals in China. Seven major components make up the questionnaire, including chi-square tests or Fisher exact probabilities to measure the differences in KAP between hospitals grades. Comparing distributions of ordered data between groups was done using the Kruskal-Wallis H test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Multiple choice questions use multiple response cross analysis. Correlation was evaluated by the Spearman correlation coefficient.
Results
84.2% participants believed that anti-tumor therapy is equally important as palliative care. The satisfaction rate of participants from grade 3 hospitals, which was significantly higher than that of grade 2 and grade 1 hospitals (χ2=27.402, P=0.002). The most common symptoms requiring LCPC was pain. The major barriers toward to LCPC were “Patients and families are concerned about the safety of long-term use of palliative care related drugs”. The most common reasons for the use of PCA treatment were 31.1% participants thought “Patients with systemic application of large doses of opioids or adverse reactions to opioids that cannot be tolerated”. The top three barriers toward PCA treatment of cancer pain were (i) worry about adverse reactions of drug overdose, (ii) worry about opioid addiction, and (iii) increase of patients' economic burden. In the past 24 months, 33.9% of the participants had not participated in online or offline training related to palliative care of lung cancer.
Conclusions
Chinese healthcare workers are in need of training for lung cancer palliative care and, in particular, for controlling cancer pain symptoms.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1502P - Sexual dysfunction and quality of life in rectal cancer
Presenter: Fatih Kus
Session: Poster session 10
1503P - Spiritual needs in cancer patients: A cross-sectional study
Presenter: Diego Toloi
Session: Poster session 10
1546P - Use of ESMO-MCBS Scorecards in supporting funding decisions in private insurance
Presenter: Samantha Field
Session: Poster session 10
1547P - Time from approval to reimbursement of new cancer and non-cancer drugs: A comparative analysis between the US, England, Germany, and Switzerland (2011-2022)
Presenter: Camille Glaus
Session: Poster session 10
1548P - Real-world impact of the platinum chemotherapy shortage on advanced cancer patients
Presenter: Jacob Reibel
Session: Poster session 10
1549P - Accelerating access to innovative oncology drugs: Insights from France's early access reform
Presenter: Tess Martin
Session: Poster session 10
1550P - Addressing uncertainties of clinical value and improving access for newly authorised indications through DRUG-Access Protocol (DAP)-like platforms: Joint collection and evaluation of real-world evidence
Presenter: Sahar van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani
Session: Poster session 10
1551P - Breakthrough therapy cancer drugs and indications with FDA approval: Development time, innovation, trials, clinical benefit, epidemiology, and price
Presenter: Christoph Michaeli
Session: Poster session 10
1552P - Regulatory approval of novel immunotherapy for lymphoid neoplasm in the US, EU, and Japan
Presenter: Kensuke Matsuda
Session: Poster session 10
1553P - Access to EMA approved drugs in Europe, disparities across a border
Presenter: Orla Fitzpatrick
Session: Poster session 10