Abstract 1499P
Background
To demonstrate the status and differences in knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of lung cancer palliative care (LCPC) management, and to measure patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in cancer pain management in of China.
Methods
A questionnaire on LCPC management was used in this study, which involved a total of 2093 participants from 706 hospitals in China. Seven major components make up the questionnaire, including chi-square tests or Fisher exact probabilities to measure the differences in KAP between hospitals grades. Comparing distributions of ordered data between groups was done using the Kruskal-Wallis H test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Multiple choice questions use multiple response cross analysis. Correlation was evaluated by the Spearman correlation coefficient.
Results
84.2% participants believed that anti-tumor therapy is equally important as palliative care. The satisfaction rate of participants from grade 3 hospitals, which was significantly higher than that of grade 2 and grade 1 hospitals (χ2=27.402, P=0.002). The most common symptoms requiring LCPC was pain. The major barriers toward to LCPC were “Patients and families are concerned about the safety of long-term use of palliative care related drugs”. The most common reasons for the use of PCA treatment were 31.1% participants thought “Patients with systemic application of large doses of opioids or adverse reactions to opioids that cannot be tolerated”. The top three barriers toward PCA treatment of cancer pain were (i) worry about adverse reactions of drug overdose, (ii) worry about opioid addiction, and (iii) increase of patients' economic burden. In the past 24 months, 33.9% of the participants had not participated in online or offline training related to palliative care of lung cancer.
Conclusions
Chinese healthcare workers are in need of training for lung cancer palliative care and, in particular, for controlling cancer pain symptoms.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1574P - Medical oncology residents mentors (MORM): A target for resiliency interventions
Presenter: David Paez
Session: Poster session 10
1575P - Smoke-free policies in outdoor areas: A potential cancer prevention strategy in Spain
Presenter: Karen Ramírez Cervantes
Session: Poster session 10
1576P - Smoking and lung cancer mortality in Italian men and women: 2003-2019
Presenter: Diego Serraino
Session: Poster session 10
1577P - Indoor radon in patients with lung cancer in Spain: Preliminary data from the MIRROR study
Presenter: Marta Garcia De Herreros
Session: Poster session 10
1578P - Perception of LMIC oncologists on meaningful cancer trial endpoints and value of cancer drugs
Presenter: Soumitra Shankar Datta
Session: Poster session 10
1579P - The Dutch national adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer care network, a data driven learning healthcare system
Presenter: Winette Van Der Graaf
Session: Poster session 10
1580P - Impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) on disparities in next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing in cancer patients (pts) in the US
Presenter: Chadi Hage Chehade
Session: Poster session 10
1581P - AI enabled intervention increased real-world guideline compliant care: Improving genomic testing and cascade genetics for women with ovarian cancer (OC)
Presenter: Premal Thaker
Session: Poster session 10
1582P - Pregnancy and miscarriage in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients harboring mutational signature of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)
Presenter: Lorena Incorvaia
Session: Poster session 10
1583P - Trial-level surrogacy of intermediate endpoints in adjuvant or neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint blockade
Presenter: Luís Leite
Session: Poster session 10