Abstract 1499P
Background
To demonstrate the status and differences in knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of lung cancer palliative care (LCPC) management, and to measure patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in cancer pain management in of China.
Methods
A questionnaire on LCPC management was used in this study, which involved a total of 2093 participants from 706 hospitals in China. Seven major components make up the questionnaire, including chi-square tests or Fisher exact probabilities to measure the differences in KAP between hospitals grades. Comparing distributions of ordered data between groups was done using the Kruskal-Wallis H test or the Mann-Whitney U test. Multiple choice questions use multiple response cross analysis. Correlation was evaluated by the Spearman correlation coefficient.
Results
84.2% participants believed that anti-tumor therapy is equally important as palliative care. The satisfaction rate of participants from grade 3 hospitals, which was significantly higher than that of grade 2 and grade 1 hospitals (χ2=27.402, P=0.002). The most common symptoms requiring LCPC was pain. The major barriers toward to LCPC were “Patients and families are concerned about the safety of long-term use of palliative care related drugs”. The most common reasons for the use of PCA treatment were 31.1% participants thought “Patients with systemic application of large doses of opioids or adverse reactions to opioids that cannot be tolerated”. The top three barriers toward PCA treatment of cancer pain were (i) worry about adverse reactions of drug overdose, (ii) worry about opioid addiction, and (iii) increase of patients' economic burden. In the past 24 months, 33.9% of the participants had not participated in online or offline training related to palliative care of lung cancer.
Conclusions
Chinese healthcare workers are in need of training for lung cancer palliative care and, in particular, for controlling cancer pain symptoms.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1481P - A case-control study of drug-eluting microspheres and blank microspheres in bronchial artery embolization for hemoptysis in non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Tongguo Si
Session: Poster session 10
1482P - Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) for palliation of jaundice in patients of unresectable/disseminated carcinoma gall bladder with hilar block: Is it a worthwhile enterprise?
Presenter: Saurabh Galodha
Session: Poster session 10
1484P - Inflammatory patterns of ascites in patients with solid tumors
Presenter: Julia Berger
Session: Poster session 10
1485P - Mitigating symptom clusters of patients with metastatic cancer through a remote physical exercise program (EXIO)
Presenter: Paulo Bergerot
Session: Poster session 10
1486P - A personalized rehabilitation pilot program for improving QOL of unresectable metastatic lung cancer patients
Presenter: Shani Shilo
Session: Poster session 10
1487P - Telemonitoring system effectiveness for alleviating cancer pain in patients with advanced cancer
Presenter: Shiori Yoshida
Session: Poster session 10
1488P - Use of mobile app “SUPPORT+” to enhance community palliative care in advanced cancer patients: A feasibility study
Presenter: Wendy Chan
Session: Poster session 10
1489P - Factors influencing adherence to electronic patient-reported outcomes in palliative cancer care
Presenter: Sarah Gomes
Session: Poster session 10
1490P - Health-related quality of life of cancer patients on chemotherapy and its relationship with caregiver strain: A cross-sectional analytical study
Presenter: Herald Mapa
Session: Poster session 10
Resources:
Abstract