Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 07

29P - Considering intra-patient response variability in clinical trials: Implications for treatment efficacy and survival

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 07

Presenters

Caryn Geady

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S215-S228. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1574

Authors

C. Geady1, D. Shultz2, B. Haibe-Kains3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto - St. George Campus, M5S 3H7 - Toronto/CA
  • 2 Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, M5G 1Z5 - Toronto/CA
  • 3 Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, UHN - University Health Network - Princess Margaret Cancer Center, M5G 2M9 - Toronto/CA

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 29P

Background

Clinical trials often use Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) to assess treatment effectiveness. RECIST measures the sum of predefined target lesion diameters on radiologic imaging longitudinally and categorizes patients based on the sum of individual lesion changes. For this study, we leveraged a unique dataset in soft tissue sarcoma (STS), a model of tumor heterogeneity, to investigate the potential relevance of variability in intra-patient lesion responses.

Methods

Lesions in advanced STS patients were assessed according to RECIST before and after 2 cycles of chemotherapy for patients with 2 or more target lesions. Lesions with a diameter increase of 20% or more were labeled ‘non-responders' and the rest were ‘responders'. Patients were categorized as ‘homogeneous' if all lesions responded or ‘heterogeneous' if at least one did not. Survival differences between patients were analyzed using the log-rank test.

Results

Lesion-specific treatment responses were assessed in 466 patients with advanced STS enrolled in an open-label clinical trial (NCT01440088). Among patients who, according to RECIST, had “stable” disease (SD), overall survival (OS) was lower in the heterogeneous versus homogeneous cohorts (p=0.01). A majority of patients (78.7%) had all lesions responding to therapy, whereas the remaining patients (oligoprogressors) had 1 (18.8%) or 2 (2.5%) non-responding lesions.

Conclusions

In advanced STSs, oligoprogression correlated with poorer survival outcomes compared to patients without progressive lesions, despite both groups being classified as “stable” according to RECIST. Such oligoprogressive patients may benefit from local targeted therapy in addition to systemic treatment in order to “convert” them to non-progressors. Our results indicate that a lesion-specific approach could potentially alter the outcomes of clinical trials, suggesting a need for a more nuanced evaluation method of treatment response.

Clinical trial identification

NCT01440088 (Our retrospective study uses the data from this trial.)

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P50CA272170.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.