Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 07

1810P - MYC expression defines distinct transcriptomic landscape and affects response to DNA-damaging therapies in SCLC

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 07

Topics

Cancer Biology;  Tumour Immunology;  Molecular Oncology;  Genetic and Genomic Testing

Tumour Site

Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Caterina de Rosa

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S1062-S1076. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1611

Authors

C. de Rosa1, C. Tuccillo1, L. Amato2, A. ariano3, A. Servetto4, F. Papaccio5, F. Ciardiello6, F. Morgillo7, C.M. Della Corte8

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Precision Medicine, Universita degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 - Napoli/IT
  • 2 Department Of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 - Napoli/IT
  • 3 Department Of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Department of Precision Medicine, Naples, Italy, 80138 - Napoli/IT
  • 4 Clinical Medicine And Surgery, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80138 - Napoli/IT
  • 5 Medicine, Surgery & Dentistry Dept., University of Salerno, 84084 - Fisciano/IT
  • 6 Dipartimento Di Medicina Di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 - Napoli/IT
  • 7 Dept Of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 - Napoli/IT
  • 8 Dipartimento Di Oncologia, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 80131 - Napoli/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1810P

Background

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by TP53/RB1 loss and amplification of MYC in approximately 30% of patients. DNA damaging therapies synergize with immunotherapy in SCLC in in vivo models by activating a Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING)-mediated immune response. In addition, MYC is known to be positively correlated with STING pathway downstream chemokines (CXCL10 and CCL5) in SCLC clinical datasets. Here we aimed to define the transcriptional profile of SCLC cell lines in relation to MYC expression levels.

Methods

We performed GSEA on RNAseq data obtained from n=6 SCLC cell lines classified as MYClow or MYChigh before and after treatment with cisplatin. We validated transcriptomic data by immunofluorescence, flow cytometry and western blot.

Results

GSEA revealed enrichment of immune-related pathways, including type I interferon response, interleukins and chemokines response gene sets in MYChigh cells. Epithelial markers, cell adhesion molecules and stemness downregulation datasets were also enriched in MYChigh subset. In constrast, MYClow SCLC cell lines were particularly enriched for glycolysis and mesenchymal gene sets. In addition, STING and PD-L1 protein expression was higher in MYChigh compared to MYClow SCLC cells. Cisplatin treatment affected transcriptomic profile of MYChigh subset by increasing DNA repair, aerobic respiration and innate immune pathways related to viral infections. Interestingly, GSEA of cisplatin-treated MYClow showed enrichment in chemotherapy-resistance genes along with increase of proliferation and lung cancer poor survival. In addition, cisplatin-treated MYClow showed an increase in AURKA and ATR genesets. In parallel, in vitro treatment with cisplatin increased STING expression in MYChigh cells, while it decreased or had no effect on STING in MYClow cells.

Conclusions

SCLC cells with different MYC levels display distinct transcriptomic landscapes. Overall, MYChigh cells are more responsive to innate immune cell activation. In contrast, MYClow cells exhibit more mesenchymal and chemotherapy-resistant features. Finally, the AURKA/ATR pathway in the MYClow subset may be potential candidates for combination therapies in cisplatin-resistant SCLC models.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

AIRC.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.