Abstract 1376P
Background
Despite the improvement in survival achieved with immunotherapy (IO)-based treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), some patients experience rapid disease progression. Here, we sought to evaluate the clinical utility of ctDNA fluctuations after the first cycle to predict survival outcomes.
Methods
A total of 64 plasma samples were analyzed. Paired basal (PT) and post cycle 1 (PC1) liquid biopsies were collected from 32 stage IV NSCLC patients treated with first-line IO or chemo-IO. Cell-free DNA was isolated using QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit and analyzed by next-generation sequencing using the Oncomine Pan-Cancer Cell-Free Assay on an Ion S5 sequencer. Variant files were obtained with the Ion Reporter analysis platform and variant filtering was performed using an in-house bioinformatic pipeline. Tumor response was evaluated with PET-CT and CT according to the RECIST v. 1.1 criteria. Statistical analysis was conducted using R software.
Results
ctDNA levels, calculated as the sum of the mutant allele frequency (MAF) of all detected variants (SumMAF), were compared in the PT and PC1 samples, identifying 14 patients (43.75%) with increased ctDNA (non-responders, NR), and 18 being responders (R) with equal or decreased ctDNA. Significant differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were observed between the two groups with a median PFS and OS of 4.44 and 6.33 months, respectively, in NR patients and not reached in R patients (PFS, HR:4.1; 95% CI 1.40-12.0; OS, HR:3.9; 95% CI 1.30-12.0). Specifically, 78.57% of NR patients experienced disease progression in less than 6 months compared to 27.78% of R patients. Other parameters to quantify ctDNA such as mean MAF, median MAF, maximum MAF or number of variants (NV) validated these results. Furthermore, all patients with an increase in both sumMAF and NV experienced disease progression.
Conclusions
The integration of baseline and early on-treatment ctDNA analysis enables the identification of patients that do not benefit from IO-based treatments as early as three weeks after the initiation of the therapy, anticipating disease progression and being useful to tailor patient management.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Fundación Para La Investigación Biomédica Del Hospital Universitario Puerta De Hierro Majadahonda.
Funding
This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Innovation (grant no.RTC2019-007359-1). Additionally, Lucia Robado de Lope is supported by a Juan de la Cierva fellowship (grant no. JDC2022-049091-I).
Disclosure
V. Calvo de Juan: Financial Interests, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Roche, MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, Takeda, Amgen, Janssen, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Advisory Board: Sanofi, GSK. A. Collazo Lorduy: Financial Interests, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: AstraZeneca, Janssen. B. Massuti Sureda: Financial Interests, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Roche, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda. P. Diz Tain: Financial Interests, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche, MSD, Takeda, Pfizer, Amgen; Financial Interests, Advisory Board: Boehringer Ingelheim. M.A. Sala Gonzalez: Financial Interests, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Takeda, Roche. A. Lopez Martin: Financial Interests, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: GSK, BMS, AstraZeneca. J. Rogado: Financial Interests, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD, Merck, Ferrer, Persan Farma, Fresenius Kabi, Sanofi. A. Sanchez Hernandez: Financial Interests, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Roche, MSD, AstraZeneca, Janssen. J.L. Gonzalez-Larriba: Financial Interests, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: MSD, Janssen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, Astella. A.M. Martinez De Castro: Financial Interests, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: BMS, MSD, Pfizer. A. Romero: Financial Interests, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: Takeda, Illumina, Health in Code, Thermo Fisher. M. Provencio Pulla: Financial Interests, Speaker, Consultant, Advisor: BMS, AstraZeneca, MSD, Roche, Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1752P - A retrospective single-center study of outcomes to immune checkpoint blockade-based therapy in leiomyosarcoma
Presenter: Olayode Babatunde
Session: Poster session 06
1753P - Outcomes of multidisciplinary treatment of localized myxofibrosarcoma: Retrospective analysis from a reference center
Presenter: Iwona Kalinowska
Session: Poster session 06
1755P - Multimodal therapy in first line treatment of very high risk Ewing sarcoma patients: Results of the French prospective multicenter COMBINAIR3 phase II trial
Presenter: Valerie Laurence
Session: Poster session 06
1756P - A phase I/II trial of gemcitabine, docetaxel, and hydroxychloroquine in advanced/metastatic osteosarcoma
Presenter: J Andrew Livingston
Session: Poster session 06
1757P - Proceedings of the think tank for osteosarcoma medical advisory board meeting
Presenter: Sant Chawla
Session: Poster session 06
1758P - Real-world efficacy of imatinib in patients with advanced GIST: The LRG registry
Presenter: Gahyun Gim
Session: Poster session 06
1759P - Long-term updated outcomes of a phase II study of ripretinib vs. sunitinib in chinese patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor
Presenter: Jian Li
Session: Poster session 06
1760P - Impact of adjuvant imatinib on recurrence for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) associated GISTs: An analysis of the RECKGIST cohort from the French NETSARC+ network
Presenter: Vincent Hautefeuille
Session: Poster session 06
1761P - Clinical description and development of a prognosis score for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) associated GISTs in the RECKGIST cohort: A retrospective study from the French NETSARC+ network
Presenter: Charlotte Cuvelier
Session: Poster session 06