Abstract 29P
Background
Clinical trials often use Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) to assess treatment effectiveness. RECIST measures the sum of predefined target lesion diameters on radiologic imaging longitudinally and categorizes patients based on the sum of individual lesion changes. For this study, we leveraged a unique dataset in soft tissue sarcoma (STS), a model of tumor heterogeneity, to investigate the potential relevance of variability in intra-patient lesion responses.
Methods
Lesions in advanced STS patients were assessed according to RECIST before and after 2 cycles of chemotherapy for patients with 2 or more target lesions. Lesions with a diameter increase of 20% or more were labeled ‘non-responders' and the rest were ‘responders'. Patients were categorized as ‘homogeneous' if all lesions responded or ‘heterogeneous' if at least one did not. Survival differences between patients were analyzed using the log-rank test.
Results
Lesion-specific treatment responses were assessed in 466 patients with advanced STS enrolled in an open-label clinical trial (NCT01440088). Among patients who, according to RECIST, had “stable” disease (SD), overall survival (OS) was lower in the heterogeneous versus homogeneous cohorts (p=0.01). A majority of patients (78.7%) had all lesions responding to therapy, whereas the remaining patients (oligoprogressors) had 1 (18.8%) or 2 (2.5%) non-responding lesions.
Conclusions
In advanced STSs, oligoprogression correlated with poorer survival outcomes compared to patients without progressive lesions, despite both groups being classified as “stable” according to RECIST. Such oligoprogressive patients may benefit from local targeted therapy in addition to systemic treatment in order to “convert” them to non-progressors. Our results indicate that a lesion-specific approach could potentially alter the outcomes of clinical trials, suggesting a need for a more nuanced evaluation method of treatment response.
Clinical trial identification
NCT01440088 (Our retrospective study uses the data from this trial.)
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number P50CA272170.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1802P - Cost-effectiveness study of atezolizumab (ATZ) vs. durvalumab (DUR) in elderly extensive disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) patients (pts): Real-world data (RWD) on first-line chemotherapy combined with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (Chemo-ICIs)
Presenter: Ken Yamamoto
Session: Poster session 07
1803P - Analysis of samples from the SCLC REACTION trial: Discovery of biomarkers to optimize treatment
Presenter: Pernelle Lavaud
Session: Poster session 07
1805P - PKD1L1 mutations in small cell lung cancer: A genomic signature for poor prognosis and drug susceptibility
Presenter: Ning Tang
Session: Poster session 07
Resources:
Abstract
1806P - Clinical characteristics and management of small cell lung cancer long survivors
Presenter: Elisa Gobbini
Session: Poster session 07
1807P - Spatial analyses revealed MMP7 as the biomarker of tumor boundary correlated with immune resistance in small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Le Tang
Session: Poster session 07
1809P - Validation of the lung inmune prognostic (LIPI) index in first-line immunotherapy treatment of small cell lung carcinoma
Presenter: Patricia Cruz Castellanos
Session: Poster session 07
1810P - MYC expression defines distinct transcriptomic landscape and affects response to DNA-damaging therapies in SCLC
Presenter: Caterina de Rosa
Session: Poster session 07