Abstract 247P
Background
Adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) is standard-of-care following breast-conserving surgery in patients with early-stage breast cancer, while adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients at higher risk of distant recurrence. Data on the ideal sequencing of both adjuvant treatment modalities is limited. Hence, we sought to investigate whether concurrent or sequential delivery of chemotherapy and RT provides superior oncologic outcomes.
Methods
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing concurrent with sequential administration of adjuvant chemotherapy and RT. Outcomes of interest included locoregional recurrence (in-breast, contralateral breast, and nodal recurrence), distant recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Statistical analyses employed random or fixed-effects models with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results
From 1,477 initially identified studies, four phase III RCTs with 3,835 patients were selected, of whom 1,932 (50.4%) received concurrent chemotherapy and RT. Locoregional recurrence was lower in patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiation compared to sequentially delivered therapy (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.43-0.78; P < 0.01). Subgroup analysis excluding T4 tumors yielded similar results. No differences between the sequencing approaches were observed in contralateral breast recurrence (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.44-1.39; P = 0.46), distant recurrence (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.82-1.32; P = 0.76), OS (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.87-1.19; P = 0.82) or DFS (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.87-1.14; P = 0.95). Concurrent therapy was associated with moderate or severe breast subcutaneous fibrosis (OR 2.38; 95% CI 1.15-4.91; P <0.01; I2 = 33%) and telangiectasia (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.00-3.44; P = 0.05), while no statistically significant difference was observed regarding lymphedema and severe skin toxicity.
Conclusions
Adjuvant therapy delivered via concurrent chemoradiation improved locoregional control at a cost of increased breast fibrosis and telangectasia. No differences were observed in DFS or OS. Further RCTs using more modern systemic and radiation therapy regimens are warranted.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1988P - Enfortumab vedotin (EV) + pembrolizumab (P) outcomes outside clinical trials and biomarkers of benefit in patients (pts) with advanced urothelial carcinoma: Analysis of the UNITE study
Presenter: Tanya Jindal
Session: Poster session 13
1989P - Efficacy of enfortumab vedotin (EV) in patients (pts) with (w) advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who have baseline neuropathy (N) and/or diabetes mellitus (DM): A UNITE study analysis
Presenter: Albert Jang
Session: Poster session 13
1990P - MRG002-HER2 ADC combined with pucotenlimab (a PD-1 inhibitor), in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC): Preliminary results of a phase I/II study
Presenter: Chuanliang Cui
Session: Poster session 13
1992P - Real-world (RW) characteristics and outcomes in patients (pts) with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIUC) treated with adjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC)
Presenter: Hedyeh Ebrahimi
Session: Poster session 13
1993P - A randomized, phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eribulin mesylate in combination with atezolizumab compared to atezolizumab alone in subjects with locally advanced or metastatic transitional cell urothelial cancer where cisplatin-based treatment is not an option
Presenter: Anishka D'Souza
Session: Poster session 13
1994P - Updated efficacy profile of the double antibody drug conjugate (DAD) phase I trial: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) plus enfortumab vedotin (EV) in ≥ second line in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster session 13
1995P - Insights into second-line (2L) systemic treatment (tx) receipt in patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): Results of a retrospective observational study in Germany
Presenter: Günter Niegisch
Session: Poster session 13
1996P - Primary analysis of post-marketing surveillance (PMS) data for avelumab maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with curatively unresectable urothelial carcinoma (UC) in Japan
Presenter: Eiji Kikuchi
Session: Poster session 13
1997P - Novel biomarker, ephrinB2 (B2), predicts resistance to treatment and poor overall survival (OS) metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Sarmad Sadeghi
Session: Poster session 13