Abstract 247P
Background
Adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) is standard-of-care following breast-conserving surgery in patients with early-stage breast cancer, while adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients at higher risk of distant recurrence. Data on the ideal sequencing of both adjuvant treatment modalities is limited. Hence, we sought to investigate whether concurrent or sequential delivery of chemotherapy and RT provides superior oncologic outcomes.
Methods
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing concurrent with sequential administration of adjuvant chemotherapy and RT. Outcomes of interest included locoregional recurrence (in-breast, contralateral breast, and nodal recurrence), distant recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Statistical analyses employed random or fixed-effects models with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results
From 1,477 initially identified studies, four phase III RCTs with 3,835 patients were selected, of whom 1,932 (50.4%) received concurrent chemotherapy and RT. Locoregional recurrence was lower in patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiation compared to sequentially delivered therapy (OR 0.58; 95% CI 0.43-0.78; P < 0.01). Subgroup analysis excluding T4 tumors yielded similar results. No differences between the sequencing approaches were observed in contralateral breast recurrence (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.44-1.39; P = 0.46), distant recurrence (OR 1.04; 95% CI 0.82-1.32; P = 0.76), OS (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.87-1.19; P = 0.82) or DFS (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.87-1.14; P = 0.95). Concurrent therapy was associated with moderate or severe breast subcutaneous fibrosis (OR 2.38; 95% CI 1.15-4.91; P <0.01; I2 = 33%) and telangiectasia (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.00-3.44; P = 0.05), while no statistically significant difference was observed regarding lymphedema and severe skin toxicity.
Conclusions
Adjuvant therapy delivered via concurrent chemoradiation improved locoregional control at a cost of increased breast fibrosis and telangectasia. No differences were observed in DFS or OS. Further RCTs using more modern systemic and radiation therapy regimens are warranted.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2019P - Disparities in urothelial carcinoma (UC) drug approval: Contrasting North America and Europe
Presenter: Jose Tapia
Session: Poster session 13
2020TiP - SOGUG-NEOWIN: A phase II, open-label, multi-centre trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of erdafitinib (ERDA) monotherapy and ERDA and cetrelimab (CET) as neoadjuvant treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and FGFR gene alterations
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster session 13
2022TiP - Stereotactic treatment with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and enfortumab vedotin: A phase I/II study for localized, cisplatin ineligible, muscle invasive bladder cancer (STAR-EV)
Presenter: Tian Zhang
Session: Poster session 13
2024TiP - NETOS: A personalized approach of neoadjuvant therapy, including INCB099280 monotherapy and bladder preservation, for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma (MIBC) with ctDNA monitoring
Presenter: Valentina Tateo
Session: Poster session 13