Abstract 79P
Background
ESMO and NCCN have recommended Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) to identify patients eligible for matched targeted treatment. Here, we assess adherence with guideline-recommended targeted therapy recommendations and assess the time from genomic sequencing to the initiation of targeted medication in a diverse, real-world dataset of advanced NSCLC patients.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed de-identified metastatic NSCLC records from the Tempus multimodal database, which encompasses molecular and clinical data from diverse clinics across the United States sequenced with the Tempus xT assay from 2018-2022. The following guideline recommended actionable genomic variants were assessed: EGFR mutations, ALK fusions, ROS1 fusions, KRAS G12C mutations, BRAF V600E, RET fusions, MET ex14 skipping mutations, and NTRK1/2/3 fusions. Patients were defined as adherent if they received matched targeted therapy recommended in guidelines within 24 months of sequencing; genomic sequencing may have occurred prior to matched therapy recommendation.
Results
Among 1,407 evaluable patients, 16.5% (N= 232) had a targeted actionable variant detected by CGP. The overall adherence rate of matched targeted therapy was 87% (N=201). The adherence rate varied by actionable variant, with the highest adherence rate of 100% for EGFR exon 19 deletions (n=57), and the lowest rate 47% for BRAF V600E (n=17). Notably, a minority of adherent patients (13.4%, n=27) were sequenced prior to the FDA approval of these targeted agents and inclusion in guidelines. For these patients the median time from CGP to initiation of matched therapy was 10 months. For the remaining patients, this time was 0.6 months.
Conclusions
In a real-world, retrospective analysis of a cohort of advanced NSCLC patients, most oncologists utilized CGP to identify and treat patients with guideline-recommended variant matched targeted therapy, with adherence rates varying by variant. Importantly, even patients that received CGP results prior to FDA approval of novel therapies, received matched therapy once they were included in guidelines.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Tempus AI.
Disclosure
J.D. Patel: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Takeda, AstraZeneca, AbbVie, AnHeart, BMS, Gilead, Sanofi, Takeda, Guardant; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, also travel support: Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel: Tempus. K. Nadhamuni: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Tempus Labs; Financial Interests, Institutional, Stocks/Shares: Tempus Labs; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Full time employee: Tempus Labs. A. Mitra: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Tempus AI; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Tempus Ai, Guardant Health. M. Carty: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Tempus Labs; Financial Interests, Institutional, Stocks/Shares: Tempus Labs; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Tempus Labs. H. Nimeiri: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Tempus; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Tempus, AbbVie. I. Klein: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment, Full time employee, also granted shares in the company with potential future value.: Tempus Labs, Inc.; Financial Interests, Institutional, Stocks/Shares, Granted as part of overall compensation, may have future value.: Tempus Labs, Inc.; Non-Financial Interests, Member of Board of Directors, This is a not for profit organization (503c) that advocates for appropriate medication oversight and usage in the US healthcare system, based on literature regarding waste and medical error in today's system: Get the Meds Right. R. Pelossof: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Tempus; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, RSUs: Tempus.
Resources from the same session
1802P - Cost-effectiveness study of atezolizumab (ATZ) vs. durvalumab (DUR) in elderly extensive disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) patients (pts): Real-world data (RWD) on first-line chemotherapy combined with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (Chemo-ICIs)
Presenter: Ken Yamamoto
Session: Poster session 07
1803P - Analysis of samples from the SCLC REACTION trial: Discovery of biomarkers to optimize treatment
Presenter: Pernelle Lavaud
Session: Poster session 07
1805P - PKD1L1 mutations in small cell lung cancer: A genomic signature for poor prognosis and drug susceptibility
Presenter: Ning Tang
Session: Poster session 07
Resources:
Abstract
1806P - Clinical characteristics and management of small cell lung cancer long survivors
Presenter: Elisa Gobbini
Session: Poster session 07
1807P - Spatial analyses revealed MMP7 as the biomarker of tumor boundary correlated with immune resistance in small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Le Tang
Session: Poster session 07
1809P - Validation of the lung inmune prognostic (LIPI) index in first-line immunotherapy treatment of small cell lung carcinoma
Presenter: Patricia Cruz Castellanos
Session: Poster session 07
1810P - MYC expression defines distinct transcriptomic landscape and affects response to DNA-damaging therapies in SCLC
Presenter: Caterina de Rosa
Session: Poster session 07