Abstract 549P
Background
During colorectal cancer (CRC) progression, half of all patients develop CRC liver metastasis (CRLM). Perioperative chemotherapy plus targeted therapy translates to high resection and improved survival rates. Still, CRLM are dependent on pathologic tumor staging according UICC System of primary CRC. The genetic and epigenetic background of CRLM defined by microsatellite stability, KRAS/BRAF, CpG-Island-methylator phenotype and immune infiltrates is still under debate as prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Our aim was to assess the prognostic impact of immune responses in CRLM analyzed by complex immune profiling, morphometry and various sequencing techniques.
Methods
227 consecutive patients with FFPE of CRLM resections (2008-2018) and follow-up data from the clinical database were prospectively collected until 2023. Next-generation sequencing (NGS), targeted RNAseq, immunohistochemical staining (IHC) and computerized morphometric models evaluated tumor material for different immune cell types. In-silico analyses were done by network associations. Chemotherapy-naive and treated patients were compared to their outcome.
Results
All CRLM patients with preoperative chemotherapy showed a significant worse OS vs therapy-naïve patients after CRLM surgery (p<0,0001). 113 patients with pretreatment had higher CD8+ Tcell infiltrates (p=0,001) and M2 macrophages (p<0,0001). In the perioperative group, patients with higher M1 macrophage infiltration versus no infiltration (p=0,024) as well as with CD8+ Tcell low-distance to tumor cells versus high distances (p=0,033) had significant better OS. In-silico gene expression analyses of 172 CD8 Tcell+ CRLM had downregulation of cancer-associated genes, and the quality of immune cells was regulated by IFNg immune defense pathways.
Conclusions
In CRLM patients, we defined immune cell infiltrate clusters in responders and non-responders after preoperative chemotherapy. Combined morphometric immune signatures are new prognostic and predictive biomarkers, to identify new specific targets for perioperative therapy, to optimize postoperative follow-up or to plan individualized vaccination strategies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
MSD.
Disclosure
M. Kloth: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: MSD. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
557P - Three-year update of real-world evaluation of ColonAiQ for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals
Presenter: Baohua Wang
Session: Poster session 16
558P - Survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy based on molecular residual disease detection in resected colorectal liver metastases: Subgroup analysis from CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY
Presenter: Kozo Kataoka
Session: Poster session 16
561P - Liquid biopsy tracking of immunotherapy-induced T cell dynamics in MSS colorectal and endometrial tumors
Presenter: Holger Heyn
Session: Poster session 16
562P - Acquired genomic alterations on first-line chemotherapy (CT) + cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer (mCRC): Circulating tumor (ct)DNA analysis of the randomized phase II trial TIME-PRODIGE-28
Presenter: Valerie Boige
Session: Poster session 16
564P - Short-course radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitor in proficient mismatch repair or microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) low-lying early rectal cancer: Preliminary findings from a prospective, multi-center, phase II trial (TORCH-E)
Presenter: Fan Xia
Session: Poster session 16
565P - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, excision, and observation for early rectal cancer: The phase II NEO trial (CCTG CO.28) results after minimum 3 years follow up
Presenter: Carl Brown
Session: Poster session 16
566P - Impact of weekly irinotecan’s cycles during preoperative chemoradiotherpy in locally advanced rectal cancer: A post-hoc analysis of the CinClare study
Presenter: Ji Zhu
Session: Poster session 16