Abstract 560P
Background
The treatment of small pulmonary-limited nodules (SPN) in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients remains controversy since it is uncertain whether it is distant metastasis. This interventional study is the first to explore the clinical value of tumor-informed ctDNA test in identifying low-risk patients for de-escalation therapy and high-risk patients with no evidence of disease (NED) for escalation therapy in advanced CRC patients with SPNs.
Methods
According to the longest diameter of the SPNs, patients were divided into two cohorts: Cohort 1 (0-1cm) and Cohort 2 (1-2cm). Tumor-informed ctDNA test (OriMIRACLE STM) was planned to perform every three months until progression or 2 years. In general, patients with negative MRD received active surveillance, while patients with positive MRD received intensive examination and local treatments.
Results
A total of 44 metastatic CRC patients with SPNs were successfully enrolled. The positive rate of MRD at baseline was higher in Cohort 2 (66.67%, 16/24) compared to Cohort 1 (45.00%, 9/20). The time of MRD changed from negative to positive was earlier than the time of image confirmation of disease progression (median advancement: 64.5 days, average advancement: 86.60 ± 76.99 days). The PFS was significantly shorter in patients with positive MRD at any time compared with patients with persistently negative MRD (median PFS :185 days vs. not reached, HR: 7.02; 95% CI: 1.639∼30.06; P = 0.002). The patients with MRD changed from negative to positive showed a significantly shorter PFS than those patients with persistently negative MRD (median PFS :175 days vs. not reached, HR: 8.655; 95% CI: 1.75∼42.81; P= 0.002).
Conclusions
Higher baseline positive rate of MRD was observed in patients with 1-2 cm SPNs. For patients with initially negative MRD, positive MRD at any time during follow-up could predict extrapulmonary metastasis. Positive MRD could predict disease progression ahead of clinical routine imaging examination. MRD status are closely related to prognosis, which may indicate whether the intensity of imaging examination needs to be adjusted.
Clinical trial identification
This is an ongoing, open-label, prospective phase II cohort study (NCT05495672).
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
547P - Artificial Intelligence-powered analysis of the tumor immune microenvironment in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Elio Adib
Session: Poster session 16
548P - Simplified immune score based on CD8+ T-cells at the invasive margin provides comparable prognostic value to immune scores in non-metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Durgesh Wankhede
Session: Poster session 16
549P - Combined morphometric immune signatures define the prognosis of patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Markus Moehler
Session: Poster session 16
550P - The impact of mismatch repair status on accuracy of clinical staging in upfront resected stage II/III rectal cancer in the Netherlands
Presenter: Renee Lunenberg
Session: Poster session 16
551P - Efficacy prediction of chemoradiotherapy plus anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment by magnetic resonance imaging in MSS locally advanced rectal cancer
Presenter: Wentao Tang
Session: Poster session 16
552P - Baseline imaging biomarkers to predict outcomes in locally advanced colon cancer (LACC): Data from the FOxTROT international randomised-controlled trial
Presenter: James Platt
Session: Poster session 16
553P - Association of ctDNA-based MRD detection and MRD clearance with short-term overall survival in patients with resectable colorectal cancer: Updated analysis of CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY
Presenter: JUN NAGATA
Session: Poster session 16
555P - Association between copy number aberration and ctDNA MRD in colorectal cancer: CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY
Presenter: TOMOYA HARIMA
Session: Poster session 16