Abstract 429P
Background
Routine BIS in patients with MBC without neurological symptoms is not currently recommended, as no survival/quality-of-life improvements have been demonstrated. We investigated physicians and patients’ perspectives.
Methods
Anonymous questionnaires for BC patients and BC-treating physicians were distributed online between 05/2023-02/2024. Data on demographics, treatments and physicians’/patients’ preferences were collected.
Results
545 patients from 14 European countries completed the questionnaire. Median age was 50 years and most had high education levels (73%). 86% had MBC, 51% hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative, 31% HER2-positive and 18% triple negative (TN) BC. 86% of patients, especially younger ones (p=0.02) and with HR- disease (p=0.03), were willing to undergo BIS for asymptomatic brain metastases (BM), despite the uncertain clinical benefit. 529 physicians from 50 countries (80% European) completed the questionnaire. Most were medical oncologists (71%) working in academic hospitals (53%). 52% of physicians sometimes/rarely request BIS, mainly when extracranial progression occurs and especially for HER2+ and TN MBC. Among physicians never recommending BIS (35%), 59% would do it if recommended by guidelines, 93% in case of clinical benefit and 32% if ≥ 30% likelihood of BM detection. Notably, 86% of patients would like to receive information regarding BM development while only 13% of physicians routinely address the issue.
Conclusions
Our results highlight the need for clinical trials investigating the clinical value of BIS for detection of asymptomatic BM. They also underline the willingness of BC patients to know more about the possibility and implications of BM development.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
533P - First-line treatment in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A large real-world study
Presenter: debora basile
Session: Poster session 15
534P - Second-line treatment in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: The ELECTRA study
Presenter: Alessia Cordua
Session: Poster session 15
535P - Safety and efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly colorectal cancer patients: An Italian real-world multicenter experience
Presenter: Alessandra Boccaccino
Session: Poster session 15
536P - A randomized phase II/III trial comparing hepatectomy followed by mFOLFOX6 with hepatectomy alone for liver metastasis from colorectal cancer: Long-term results of JCOG0603
Presenter: Yukihide Kanemitsu
Session: Poster session 15
537P - Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated findings from a single-arm, prospective phase II trial (RIFLE)
Presenter: Yajiie Chen
Session: Poster session 15
538P - Combined hepatectomy with complete cytoreduction (CCS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) vs. HIPEC alone for metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Gabriele Lech
Session: Poster session 15
540P - Early treatment discontinuation (ETD) in dMMR/MSI-H metastastic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)
Presenter: Julien Taieb
Session: Poster session 15
541P - Nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) vs chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line (1L) treatment for microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Subgroup efficacy and expanded safety analyses from CheckMate 8HW
Presenter: Thierry André
Session: Poster session 15