Abstract 429P
Background
Routine BIS in patients with MBC without neurological symptoms is not currently recommended, as no survival/quality-of-life improvements have been demonstrated. We investigated physicians and patients’ perspectives.
Methods
Anonymous questionnaires for BC patients and BC-treating physicians were distributed online between 05/2023-02/2024. Data on demographics, treatments and physicians’/patients’ preferences were collected.
Results
545 patients from 14 European countries completed the questionnaire. Median age was 50 years and most had high education levels (73%). 86% had MBC, 51% hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative, 31% HER2-positive and 18% triple negative (TN) BC. 86% of patients, especially younger ones (p=0.02) and with HR- disease (p=0.03), were willing to undergo BIS for asymptomatic brain metastases (BM), despite the uncertain clinical benefit. 529 physicians from 50 countries (80% European) completed the questionnaire. Most were medical oncologists (71%) working in academic hospitals (53%). 52% of physicians sometimes/rarely request BIS, mainly when extracranial progression occurs and especially for HER2+ and TN MBC. Among physicians never recommending BIS (35%), 59% would do it if recommended by guidelines, 93% in case of clinical benefit and 32% if ≥ 30% likelihood of BM detection. Notably, 86% of patients would like to receive information regarding BM development while only 13% of physicians routinely address the issue.
Conclusions
Our results highlight the need for clinical trials investigating the clinical value of BIS for detection of asymptomatic BM. They also underline the willingness of BC patients to know more about the possibility and implications of BM development.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
523P - A phase II study of intrapatient dose escalation of biweekly trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab for colorectal cancer (E-BiTS study)
Presenter: Munehiro Wakabayashi
Session: Poster session 15
524P - A phase II study of alpelisib, a PIK3CA inhibitor, and capecitabine in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who failed two prior standard chemotherapies
Presenter: Ahreum Lim
Session: Poster session 15
525P - Final analysis of the JACCRO CC-16: Ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI for RAS wild-type mCRC refractory to anti-EGFR antibody
Presenter: Keiji Sugiyama
Session: Poster session 15
526P - Efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A FRESCO-2 subgroup analysis by age
Presenter: Maria Elena Elez Fernandez
Session: Poster session 15
527P - Effect of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in combination with bevacizumab (bev) in patients treated in SUNLIGHT by clinical prognostic factors at baseline
Presenter: Josep Tabernero
Session: Poster session 15
529P - Evaluating metastatic disease sites as a prognostic marker in patients receiving sequential treatment with regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil for refractory colorectal cancer: Survival outcomes from the multicenter retrospective “ReTrITA” study
Presenter: Carlo Signorelli
Session: Poster session 15
530P - Real-world effectiveness and predictive biomarker analysis of TAS-102+bevacizumab vs. regorafenib vs. TAS-102 in metastatic colorectal cancer: A multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Andreas Seeber
Session: Poster session 15
531P - Prognostic value of liver metastases, KRAS mutations and race in colorectal cancer patients: A pooled analysis of third-line placebo-controlled trials from the ARCAD database
Presenter: Thierry André
Session: Poster session 15
532P - G-CSF secondary prophylaxis in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI): The GERCOR LONGBOARD study
Presenter: Jean-Baptiste Bachet
Session: Poster session 15