Abstract 429P
Background
Routine BIS in patients with MBC without neurological symptoms is not currently recommended, as no survival/quality-of-life improvements have been demonstrated. We investigated physicians and patients’ perspectives.
Methods
Anonymous questionnaires for BC patients and BC-treating physicians were distributed online between 05/2023-02/2024. Data on demographics, treatments and physicians’/patients’ preferences were collected.
Results
545 patients from 14 European countries completed the questionnaire. Median age was 50 years and most had high education levels (73%). 86% had MBC, 51% hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2-negative, 31% HER2-positive and 18% triple negative (TN) BC. 86% of patients, especially younger ones (p=0.02) and with HR- disease (p=0.03), were willing to undergo BIS for asymptomatic brain metastases (BM), despite the uncertain clinical benefit. 529 physicians from 50 countries (80% European) completed the questionnaire. Most were medical oncologists (71%) working in academic hospitals (53%). 52% of physicians sometimes/rarely request BIS, mainly when extracranial progression occurs and especially for HER2+ and TN MBC. Among physicians never recommending BIS (35%), 59% would do it if recommended by guidelines, 93% in case of clinical benefit and 32% if ≥ 30% likelihood of BM detection. Notably, 86% of patients would like to receive information regarding BM development while only 13% of physicians routinely address the issue.
Conclusions
Our results highlight the need for clinical trials investigating the clinical value of BIS for detection of asymptomatic BM. They also underline the willingness of BC patients to know more about the possibility and implications of BM development.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
375P - Results from the Danish Breast Cancer Group's (DBCG) NAME-trial: A direct comparison of oral navelbine given either classic or metronomic in metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Anne Sofie Brems-Eskildsen
Session: Poster session 15
376P - Evaluating adherence to oral anticancer medications in metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer patients
Presenter: Rana El-Shewy
Session: Poster session 15
377P - Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil in pre-treated patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: A Dutch BOOG (2019-01 TIBET) study
Presenter: Niels Guchelaar
Session: Poster session 15
378P - Updated data on real-world efficacy and safety of inetetamab-based therapy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with prior exposure to trastuzumab
Presenter: Duan Yang
Session: Poster session 15
379P - Safety and efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan and concomitant radiation therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: A multicentre international retrospective cohort study
Presenter: Luca Visani
Session: Poster session 15
381P - Treatment rechallenge after grade 1 trastuzumab-deruxtecan related interstitial lung disease: A real-world experience
Presenter: Kelsey Natsuhara
Session: Poster session 15
382P - Pyrotinib combined with metronomic oral etoposide (VP-16) in heavily pretreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A single-arm, phase II study
Presenter: Jiaxuan Liu
Session: Poster session 15