Abstract 539P
Background
Despite hepatectomy being the cornerstone for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) management, the postoperative 1-year recurrence rate remains alarmingly high (∼70%). This Phase II trial assesses the efficacy and safety of an adjuvant combination therapy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with Sintilimab and Regorafenib in pts with high-risk CRLM.
Methods
Post-hepatectomy pts with histologically confirmed CRLM and a Clinical Risk Score (CRS) ≥2 were included in this study. HAIC -FOLFOX was administered every 4-6 weeks (2-4 cycles based on patient health status), alongside Sintilimab (200mg, iv, day1) and Regorafenib (80mg, po, days 1-21) every 3 weeks for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was the 1-year recurrence-free survival (1y-RFS), with secondary endpoints including TTP, OS, RFS, and safety.
Results
From August 2022 to April 2024, 35 pts with a median age of 56 (range 38-71) were enrolled. 60% were male, 40% had K-RAS mutations, all presented with an ECOG 0 and Child-Pugh class A. Majority (74.3%) had the primary tumor in the left colon, and 45.7% presented with synchronous liver metastases. Prior to hepatectomy, 80% had ≥2 liver metastases, and 22.9% had the largest liver tumor diameter >5 cm. CRS scores were 2 (42.9%), 3 (34.3%), 4 (20%), and 5 (2.9%). At a median follow-up of 13.1 months (range 11.3-20.8), 32 pts underwent at least one efficacy evaluation, 9 experienced recurrence or death within 1 year. 1y-RFS exceed the hypothesis, achieving 67.8%. TTP, OS and RFS have not yet been reached. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 60% of pts, consistent with TRAEs. Common TRAEs included hand-foot syndrome (20%), rash (17.1%), and emesis (17.1%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs were limited to rash (2.9%) and decreased platelet count (2.9%). Drug suspensions occurred in 11.4%, with 17.1% discontinuing Regorafenib due to TRAEs.
Conclusions
The adjuvant combination of HAIC, Sintilimab, and Regorafenib demonstrates feasible efficacy and an acceptable safety profile for high-risk CRLM. Further detailed analysis is warranted to confirm long-term benefits and safety of this regimen.
Clinical trial identification
NCT05753163.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
375P - Results from the Danish Breast Cancer Group's (DBCG) NAME-trial: A direct comparison of oral navelbine given either classic or metronomic in metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Anne Sofie Brems-Eskildsen
Session: Poster session 15
376P - Evaluating adherence to oral anticancer medications in metastatic and non-metastatic breast cancer patients
Presenter: Rana El-Shewy
Session: Poster session 15
377P - Phase II study of trifluridine/tipiracil in pre-treated patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: A Dutch BOOG (2019-01 TIBET) study
Presenter: Niels Guchelaar
Session: Poster session 15
378P - Updated data on real-world efficacy and safety of inetetamab-based therapy in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients with prior exposure to trastuzumab
Presenter: Duan Yang
Session: Poster session 15
379P - Safety and efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan and concomitant radiation therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: A multicentre international retrospective cohort study
Presenter: Luca Visani
Session: Poster session 15
381P - Treatment rechallenge after grade 1 trastuzumab-deruxtecan related interstitial lung disease: A real-world experience
Presenter: Kelsey Natsuhara
Session: Poster session 15
382P - Pyrotinib combined with metronomic oral etoposide (VP-16) in heavily pretreated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: A single-arm, phase II study
Presenter: Jiaxuan Liu
Session: Poster session 15