Abstract 1151P
Background
Case series study of 17 pts. with unresectable, non-metastatic paraganglioma/ pheochromocytoma (PPGL) spontaneous or germline mutations treated with standard dose lanreotide Autogel every 4 weeks.
Methods
The primary endpoints: the tumor growth rate (TGR) based on RECIST 1.1, the second- biochemical response in secretory tumors by evaluation of fractionated metoxycatecholmin every 3m. Calculation of TGR and differences in secretion of metoxycaecholamin and response to lanreotide therapy based on PFS was performed with KM estimator.
Results
Mean age 45.3 +/-16.5, male/female ratio 5/12, sporadic/hereditary 4/13 subjects (PGL1=11, PGL3=1; PGL4=1). Before strat of lanreotide in secretory tumors metoxy 4.1xULN (IQR 2.9-11.8), during -increase to 14.6 (IQR 5.6-20.4) [p=0.02], in non-secretory initially 1.0 vs 1.1 during the therapy n.s. TGR per year evaluated in all subjects, as initial follow-up 0.08 (IQR 0.1-0.4) vs. time of lanreotide therapy 0.04 (IQR 0.01-0.1) (Wilcoxon p<0.001). The significant differences in initial TGR per year and during lanreotide therapy noted in secretory tumors TGR=0.3 (0.01-0.5) vs. 0.1 (0.04-0.12) [p=0.02]; hereditary tumors 0.08 (0.04-0.28) vs. 0.02 (0.01.06) p=0.02, in multpile lesions 0.15 (0.06-0.48) vs. 0.05 (0.02-0.012), also in female 0.15 (0.06-0.39) vs. 0.02 (0.01-0.1) [p=0.01]. PFS in all subjects 42.9 months (IQR 22.9-n.r.), there was significant difference in selected groups: sporadic vs. hereditary tumors PFS=31.0 months (13.5-45.5) vs. n.r. (23.3-n.r.) [T.Cox-Mantel p=0.04] and also secretory vs. non secretory PFS=24.3 months (16.3-32.3) vs. 59.0 (43.0-n.r.) [p=0.01].
Conclusions
Lanreotide autogel therapy is effcient in reducing TGR in all subjects. TGR reduction is seen in a group of secretory tumors, hereditary syndromes and also female and multiple lesions. Lanreotide did not block over-secretion of metoxycatecholamines in secretory tumours, most of the subjects developed metabolic further progression. There are differences in PFS comparing sporadic vs. hereditary and secretory vs non-secretory indicating different biology of these tumours.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
972P - Efficacy and safety of lenvatinib vs sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: A multi-center real-world study from the LINK Research Network
Presenter: Jung Yong Hong
Session: Poster session 17
973P - Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or lenvatinib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Overall survival using real-world data from TrinetX platform
Presenter: Lisardo Ugidos De La Varga
Session: Poster session 17
977P - Transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib plus tislelizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter cohort study
Presenter: Yi Chen
Session: Poster session 17
978P - Efficacy and safety analysis of transarterial chemoembolization combined donafenib with or without immune checkpoint inhibitors in for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): A prospective, single-arm, single center, phase Ⅱ clinical study
Presenter: Jinpeng Li
Session: Poster session 17
979P - Initial results from the phase II randomized trial comparing TACE with irinotecan and mitomycin C to doxorubicin in intermediate stage HCC (IRITACE trial)
Presenter: Oliver Waidmann
Session: Poster session 17