Abstract 1151P
Background
Case series study of 17 pts. with unresectable, non-metastatic paraganglioma/ pheochromocytoma (PPGL) spontaneous or germline mutations treated with standard dose lanreotide Autogel every 4 weeks.
Methods
The primary endpoints: the tumor growth rate (TGR) based on RECIST 1.1, the second- biochemical response in secretory tumors by evaluation of fractionated metoxycatecholmin every 3m. Calculation of TGR and differences in secretion of metoxycaecholamin and response to lanreotide therapy based on PFS was performed with KM estimator.
Results
Mean age 45.3 +/-16.5, male/female ratio 5/12, sporadic/hereditary 4/13 subjects (PGL1=11, PGL3=1; PGL4=1). Before strat of lanreotide in secretory tumors metoxy 4.1xULN (IQR 2.9-11.8), during -increase to 14.6 (IQR 5.6-20.4) [p=0.02], in non-secretory initially 1.0 vs 1.1 during the therapy n.s. TGR per year evaluated in all subjects, as initial follow-up 0.08 (IQR 0.1-0.4) vs. time of lanreotide therapy 0.04 (IQR 0.01-0.1) (Wilcoxon p<0.001). The significant differences in initial TGR per year and during lanreotide therapy noted in secretory tumors TGR=0.3 (0.01-0.5) vs. 0.1 (0.04-0.12) [p=0.02]; hereditary tumors 0.08 (0.04-0.28) vs. 0.02 (0.01.06) p=0.02, in multpile lesions 0.15 (0.06-0.48) vs. 0.05 (0.02-0.012), also in female 0.15 (0.06-0.39) vs. 0.02 (0.01-0.1) [p=0.01]. PFS in all subjects 42.9 months (IQR 22.9-n.r.), there was significant difference in selected groups: sporadic vs. hereditary tumors PFS=31.0 months (13.5-45.5) vs. n.r. (23.3-n.r.) [T.Cox-Mantel p=0.04] and also secretory vs. non secretory PFS=24.3 months (16.3-32.3) vs. 59.0 (43.0-n.r.) [p=0.01].
Conclusions
Lanreotide autogel therapy is effcient in reducing TGR in all subjects. TGR reduction is seen in a group of secretory tumors, hereditary syndromes and also female and multiple lesions. Lanreotide did not block over-secretion of metoxycatecholamines in secretory tumours, most of the subjects developed metabolic further progression. There are differences in PFS comparing sporadic vs. hereditary and secretory vs non-secretory indicating different biology of these tumours.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1156P - The efficacy of lower doses of everolimus in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors
Presenter: Rachel Riechelmann
Session: Poster session 17
1157P - Retreatment with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in patients (p) with neuroendocrine tumors (NET): Spanish clinical experience from SEPTRALU national registry
Presenter: Jorge Hernando Cubero
Session: Poster session 17
1158P - A novel nomogram for predicting overall survival of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors treated with PRRT
Presenter: Dimitrios Papantoniou
Session: Poster session 17
1159P - Molecular characterization of extra-pulmonary mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinomas: The NIRVANA substudy
Presenter: Francesca Spada
Session: Poster session 17
1160P - An Italian multicenter phase II trial of metronomic temozolomide in unfit patients with advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms: Interim analysis of the MeTe study
Presenter: Francesca Spada
Session: Poster session 17
1161P - Progression-free survival ratio and the implications for treatment sequencing in neuroendocrine neoplasms
Presenter: Philipp Melhorn
Session: Poster session 17
1162P - Transcriptomic analysis of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours with carcinoid syndrome
Presenter: Javier Pozas Perez
Session: Poster session 17
1163P - Prognostic value of systemic inflammatory index (SII) in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) treated with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)
Presenter: Eduardo Terán Brage
Session: Poster session 17
1164P - The influence of neoadjuvant radiotherapy on surgical management and prognostic outcomes in locally advanced rectal neuroendocrine carcinoma
Presenter: Weiran Xu
Session: Poster session 17