Abstract 1151P
Background
Case series study of 17 pts. with unresectable, non-metastatic paraganglioma/ pheochromocytoma (PPGL) spontaneous or germline mutations treated with standard dose lanreotide Autogel every 4 weeks.
Methods
The primary endpoints: the tumor growth rate (TGR) based on RECIST 1.1, the second- biochemical response in secretory tumors by evaluation of fractionated metoxycatecholmin every 3m. Calculation of TGR and differences in secretion of metoxycaecholamin and response to lanreotide therapy based on PFS was performed with KM estimator.
Results
Mean age 45.3 +/-16.5, male/female ratio 5/12, sporadic/hereditary 4/13 subjects (PGL1=11, PGL3=1; PGL4=1). Before strat of lanreotide in secretory tumors metoxy 4.1xULN (IQR 2.9-11.8), during -increase to 14.6 (IQR 5.6-20.4) [p=0.02], in non-secretory initially 1.0 vs 1.1 during the therapy n.s. TGR per year evaluated in all subjects, as initial follow-up 0.08 (IQR 0.1-0.4) vs. time of lanreotide therapy 0.04 (IQR 0.01-0.1) (Wilcoxon p<0.001). The significant differences in initial TGR per year and during lanreotide therapy noted in secretory tumors TGR=0.3 (0.01-0.5) vs. 0.1 (0.04-0.12) [p=0.02]; hereditary tumors 0.08 (0.04-0.28) vs. 0.02 (0.01.06) p=0.02, in multpile lesions 0.15 (0.06-0.48) vs. 0.05 (0.02-0.012), also in female 0.15 (0.06-0.39) vs. 0.02 (0.01-0.1) [p=0.01]. PFS in all subjects 42.9 months (IQR 22.9-n.r.), there was significant difference in selected groups: sporadic vs. hereditary tumors PFS=31.0 months (13.5-45.5) vs. n.r. (23.3-n.r.) [T.Cox-Mantel p=0.04] and also secretory vs. non secretory PFS=24.3 months (16.3-32.3) vs. 59.0 (43.0-n.r.) [p=0.01].
Conclusions
Lanreotide autogel therapy is effcient in reducing TGR in all subjects. TGR reduction is seen in a group of secretory tumors, hereditary syndromes and also female and multiple lesions. Lanreotide did not block over-secretion of metoxycatecholamines in secretory tumours, most of the subjects developed metabolic further progression. There are differences in PFS comparing sporadic vs. hereditary and secretory vs non-secretory indicating different biology of these tumours.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1427P - Predicting overall survival and prognostic indicator genes in esophagogastric cancer patients using machine learning and bioinformatics analysis
Presenter: Nguyen-Kieu Viet-Nhi
Session: Poster session 17
1428P - Total neoadjuvant FLOT chemotherapy in oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma: An international cohort study
Presenter: Hollie Clements
Session: Poster session 17
1429P - Differences in esophageal cancer incidence and survival by race/ethnicity: A SEER analysis
Presenter: Ashwin Kulshrestha
Session: Poster session 17
1430P - Impact of menadione supplementation in the treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer: A randomized phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Francisco Cezar Moraes
Session: Poster session 17
1431P - Assessing pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A deep learning approach with voxel-level radiomics
Presenter: Yongling Ji
Session: Poster session 17
1432P - Safety of laparoscopic D2 distal gastrectomy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer patients: A prospective multicenter trial (CLASS-03a)
Presenter: Kun Yang
Session: Poster session 17