Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 09

838P - Bayesian modeling in the survival analysis of patients with multiple myeloma with emphasis on missing data analysis

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 09

Topics

Statistics;  Staging and Imaging;  Survivorship

Tumour Site

Haematological Malignancies

Presenters

Nelson Cruz Gutierrez

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S596-S612. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1593

Authors

N.A. Cruz Gutierrez1, E.A. Gonzalez Artunduaga2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Matematicas I Informatica, Universitat de les Illes Balears, 7122 - Palma de Mallorca/ES
  • 2 Patología, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 111321 - Bogota/CO

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 838P

Background

In the survival prognosis of patients with multiple myeloma, there are staging models based on Cox survival models. Current staging models do not include patients with missing data, although there are multiple investigations where the problem of missing information is very common. This situation causes results that do not represent the reality of the populations, generating biases in the true results of the research and excluding patients both in training and in the application of the model to new patients.

Methods

To solve this problem, a survival model based on Bayesian statistics was built that not only allowed us to impute the missing data of patients with multiple Myeloma using statistical methods but also allowed us to predict new patients with missing data. This model was built and tuned using data from multiple myeloma patients from a public database from a study conducted in Arkansas.

Results

The results of the Bayesian model allowed us to estimate the survival of patients with missing information. Additionally, when compared with the classic Cox models in patients with complete data, the performance metrics did not deteriorate (concordance index of 72% and 71% respectively) in patients with complete data. In addition, it allows for estimating survival and staging the risk of patients with multiple myeloma with missing data, maintaining the concordance rate at 71%.

Conclusions

A model that performs as well as Cox models in patients with complete data and maintains this performance in patients with missing data is achieved. It also allows the prediction of new patients who are diagnosed with multiple myeloma without the restriction that their complete clinical or genetic data is needed.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.