Abstract 601TiP
Background
Currently, the treatment of mCRC is chosen following the routine RAS/BRAF testing, with cetuximab/panitumumab (anti-EGFR) or bevacizumab (Bev) added to chemotherapy used as primary systemic treatment options. Findings from PARADIGM and PRESSING have suggested resistance mechanisms to anti-EGFR beyond RAS/BRAF, and the efficacy of systemic treatment for mCRC based on other mutations is unclear. To test the hypothesis of a negative hyperselection (HS) of mCRC pts for optimizing anti-EGFR, a randomized trial was initiated.
Trial design
This is a multicenter randomized trial evaluating the contribution of HS (mutations beyond RAS/BRAF V600) to anti-EGFR resistance. Pts with untreated left-sided RAS/BRAFV600-wt mCRC who are candidates for anti-EGFR are eligible. Pts will be randomized in 1:1 ratio to cohorts A (n≈177) or BC (n≈177). Pts in cohort A will receive FOLFOX + anti-EGFR. Upon treatment completion, pts in cohort A will undergo comprehensive genomic profiling (GP), and will be divided into cohort A1 (n≈120) - HS-pts and cohort A2 (n≈40), HS+. Pts recruited to cohort BC will start FOLFOX, and will undergo CGP. Based on the results of CGP, pts will be further randomized to cohorts B (n≈120, HS-) or C (n≈40, HS+). In addition to FOLFOX, in cohort B, pts will receive anti-EGFR, and in cohort C, pts will either continue FOLFOX alone or in combination with Bev. Treatment outcomes in cohorts A2 vs C, and A vs BC will be compared. Pts will be treated until PD, withdrawal, death or toxicity. The primary endpoint is PFS in the ITT, secondary endpoints are the frequency of TRAE, ORR, OS, PFS per protocol. Liquid biopsy will be collected before 1L therapy and at the time of PD to evaluate mechanisms of resistance. RAS, RIT1, BRAF (class I, II), RAC1, RAF1, ARAF, AKT1, PTEN, PIK3CA (ex 20), ERBB2/3, MET, EGFR (ECDmut), POLE (EDmut), MSI will be analyzed (CGP via NGS). Time to event data will be analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. A Cox proportional hazards model will be used to calculate the HR, 95% CIs and p-value.
Clinical trial identification
NCT06226857.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Moscow Department of Health.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
547P - Artificial Intelligence-powered analysis of the tumor immune microenvironment in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Elio Adib
Session: Poster session 16
548P - Simplified immune score based on CD8+ T-cells at the invasive margin provides comparable prognostic value to immune scores in non-metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Durgesh Wankhede
Session: Poster session 16
549P - Combined morphometric immune signatures define the prognosis of patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases
Presenter: Markus Moehler
Session: Poster session 16
550P - The impact of mismatch repair status on accuracy of clinical staging in upfront resected stage II/III rectal cancer in the Netherlands
Presenter: Renee Lunenberg
Session: Poster session 16
551P - Efficacy prediction of chemoradiotherapy plus anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment by magnetic resonance imaging in MSS locally advanced rectal cancer
Presenter: Wentao Tang
Session: Poster session 16
552P - Baseline imaging biomarkers to predict outcomes in locally advanced colon cancer (LACC): Data from the FOxTROT international randomised-controlled trial
Presenter: James Platt
Session: Poster session 16
553P - Association of ctDNA-based MRD detection and MRD clearance with short-term overall survival in patients with resectable colorectal cancer: Updated analysis of CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY
Presenter: JUN NAGATA
Session: Poster session 16
555P - Association between copy number aberration and ctDNA MRD in colorectal cancer: CIRCULATE-Japan GALAXY
Presenter: TOMOYA HARIMA
Session: Poster session 16