Abstract 1713P
Background
While longitudinal EHR data present a valuable resource for developing prognostic models for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), they lack well coded clinical outcomes including recurrence. This study harnesses this data to design a deep learning algorithm capable of accurately identifying recurrence information in individuals with localized RCC.
Methods
We curated codified and narrative EHR data including cancer characteristics extracted via natural language processing for a cohort of 28,715 patients with RCC diagnostic codes in Mass General Brigham. Gold standard labels on RCC diagnosis, recurrence timing and status were annotated for 350 patients via manual chart review. A semi-supervised label-efficient incident phenotyping deep learning algorithm (LATTE) was used to identify recurrence status and timing for eligible post-nephrectomy patients with non-metastatic RCC at diagnosis. RCC recurrence in EHR data identified via LATTE was validated against gold-standard labels and subsequently used to estimate recurrence rates stratified by AJCC TNM staging and Fuhrman grade.
Results
The eligible cohort included 5,992 patients. RCC recurrence in EHR data identified via LATTE achieved C-statistic of 0.928 in validation against annotated recurrence. The estimated 5-year recurrence rates were 16.7% (table). We observe a substantially higher recurrence risk for T3 patients (49.7%) vs T1 (3.4%) or T2 (14.3%). Table: 1713P
5-yr recurrence | |
Overall | 16.7 (15.6 %-17.8 %) |
T1 | 3.4 (2.7 %-4.2 %) |
T2 | 14.3 (11.5 %-18.4 %) |
T3 | 49.7 (45.8 %-53.7 %) |
T3G1/G2 | 25.2 (17.7 %-32.5 %) |
T3G3 | 54.2 (47.1 %-61.5 %) |
T3G4 | 72.3 (64.4 %-80.8 %) |
T4 | NR |
Conclusions
The study was successful in generating a deep learning algorithm to identify RCC recurrence in large EHR data, substantially reducing the need for time and resource intensive chart reviews. As part of ongoing research efforts, the RCC recurrence in EHR data identified via LATTE will be further used to develop an accurate recurrence risk prediction model to identify localized RCC patents at higher risk of recurrence.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Merck & Co., Inc.
Funding
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.
Disclosure
R. Bhattacharya: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Stocks/Shares: Merck & Co., Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Merck & Co., Inc. A. Elfiky: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: McKinsey and Co.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Merck & Co., Inc. V. Turzhitsky: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Merck & Co., Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Merck & Co., Inc. R.R. McKay: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Aveo, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Calithera, Dendreon, Exelixis, JNJ, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi, Tempus, BMS, Lilly, Sanofi, Seagen, Telix, Sorrento Therapeutics, Eisai, Blue Earth Diagnostics; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Molecular tumor board: Caris; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultant: Dendreon, Myovant; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Exelixis, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Steering Committee Member: Aveo, Merck, Eli Lilly; Financial Interests, Local PI: JNJ, Seagen, Calibr, Poseida, Oncternal, Scholar Rock, Merck, Xencor, Genentech, Eli Lilly, BMS; Financial Interests, Trial Chair: Bayer, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Exelixis. G. Jayram: Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role, Consultant: Merck. M. Sundaram: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Merck & Co., Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: Merck & Co., Inc., AbbVie, Johnson & Johnson; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol Myers Squibb. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1636P - Health-related quality of life outcomes of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors versus taxanes versus standard of care in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Results from the ProBio trial
Presenter: Renée Bultijnck
Session: Poster session 11
1637P - Efficacy of talazoparib and enzalutamide in mCRPC patients previously treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) or docetaxel: Post hoc analysis from both cohorts in TALAPRO-2 study
Presenter: Neeraj Agarwal
Session: Poster session 11
1638P - Enzalutamide (enza) with or without leuprolide in patients (pts) with high-risk biochemically recurrent (hrBCR) prostate cancer (PC): EMBARK post hoc analysis by age
Presenter: Neal Shore
Session: Poster session 11
1639P - Self efficacy in people with prostate cancer in the UK: A large, digital survey
Presenter: Joe O'Sullivan
Session: Poster session 11
1640P - Development and validation of a machine learning-based risk model for metastatic disease in nmCRPC patients
Presenter: Ziyun Wang
Session: Poster session 11
1641P - Phase I/II trial of oral masofaniten (EPI-7386) in combination with enzalutamide (Enz) compared to enz alone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) subjects
Presenter: Christos Kyriakopoulos
Session: Poster session 11
1642P - Integrated prognostic score in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with cabazitaxel: A CABASTY posthoc analysis
Presenter: Charles Vauchier
Session: Poster session 11
1643P - Impact of PTEN alterations on clinical outcomes in patients (pts) with de novo metastatic prostate cancer (mPC)
Presenter: Bicky Thapa
Session: Poster session 11
1644P - PSA trajectories and prediction of time to no-longer clinically benefitting in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Insights from the ProBio trial
Presenter: Lana Broer
Session: Poster session 11
1645P - Tumour suppressor gene signature predicts early progression in metastatic hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer (mHSPC) patients
Presenter: Marta Garcia De Herreros
Session: Poster session 11