Abstract 1713P
Background
While longitudinal EHR data present a valuable resource for developing prognostic models for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), they lack well coded clinical outcomes including recurrence. This study harnesses this data to design a deep learning algorithm capable of accurately identifying recurrence information in individuals with localized RCC.
Methods
We curated codified and narrative EHR data including cancer characteristics extracted via natural language processing for a cohort of 28,715 patients with RCC diagnostic codes in Mass General Brigham. Gold standard labels on RCC diagnosis, recurrence timing and status were annotated for 350 patients via manual chart review. A semi-supervised label-efficient incident phenotyping deep learning algorithm (LATTE) was used to identify recurrence status and timing for eligible post-nephrectomy patients with non-metastatic RCC at diagnosis. RCC recurrence in EHR data identified via LATTE was validated against gold-standard labels and subsequently used to estimate recurrence rates stratified by AJCC TNM staging and Fuhrman grade.
Results
The eligible cohort included 5,992 patients. RCC recurrence in EHR data identified via LATTE achieved C-statistic of 0.928 in validation against annotated recurrence. The estimated 5-year recurrence rates were 16.7% (table). We observe a substantially higher recurrence risk for T3 patients (49.7%) vs T1 (3.4%) or T2 (14.3%). Table: 1713P
5-yr recurrence | |
Overall | 16.7 (15.6 %-17.8 %) |
T1 | 3.4 (2.7 %-4.2 %) |
T2 | 14.3 (11.5 %-18.4 %) |
T3 | 49.7 (45.8 %-53.7 %) |
T3G1/G2 | 25.2 (17.7 %-32.5 %) |
T3G3 | 54.2 (47.1 %-61.5 %) |
T3G4 | 72.3 (64.4 %-80.8 %) |
T4 | NR |
Conclusions
The study was successful in generating a deep learning algorithm to identify RCC recurrence in large EHR data, substantially reducing the need for time and resource intensive chart reviews. As part of ongoing research efforts, the RCC recurrence in EHR data identified via LATTE will be further used to develop an accurate recurrence risk prediction model to identify localized RCC patents at higher risk of recurrence.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Merck & Co., Inc.
Funding
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.
Disclosure
R. Bhattacharya: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Stocks/Shares: Merck & Co., Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Merck & Co., Inc. A. Elfiky: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: McKinsey and Co.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Merck & Co., Inc. V. Turzhitsky: Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Merck & Co., Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Merck & Co., Inc. R.R. McKay: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Aveo, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Calithera, Dendreon, Exelixis, JNJ, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi, Tempus, BMS, Lilly, Sanofi, Seagen, Telix, Sorrento Therapeutics, Eisai, Blue Earth Diagnostics; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Molecular tumor board: Caris; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Consultant: Dendreon, Myovant; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Exelixis, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Steering Committee Member: Aveo, Merck, Eli Lilly; Financial Interests, Local PI: JNJ, Seagen, Calibr, Poseida, Oncternal, Scholar Rock, Merck, Xencor, Genentech, Eli Lilly, BMS; Financial Interests, Trial Chair: Bayer, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Exelixis. G. Jayram: Financial Interests, Personal, Financially compensated role, Consultant: Merck. M. Sundaram: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Merck & Co., Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks or ownership: Merck & Co., Inc., AbbVie, Johnson & Johnson; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bristol Myers Squibb. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1617P - Multi-gene copy number variation risk-score for prediction of survival and therapy response outcome in treatment-naïve metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer
Presenter: Manish Kohli
Session: Poster session 11
1618P - Clinical prognostic factors within the high volume subgroup of metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) in ENZAMET (ANZUP 1304)
Presenter: Anis Hamid
Session: Poster session 11
1619P - Efficacy of carboplatin in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Results from the biomarker-driven, randomised, outcome-adaptive ProBio trial
Presenter: Anna Kristiansen
Session: Poster session 11
1620P - Inherited variants in SRD5A genes and response to hormonal therapy in prostate cancer (SWOG S1216)
Presenter: Sue Ingles
Session: Poster session 11
Resources:
Abstract
1621P - Validation of a digital pathology-based multimodal artificial intelligence (MMAI) prostate biopsy biomarker in a prospective, real-world Swedish prostate cancer (PCa) cohort treated with radical prostatectomy
Presenter: Anders Bjartell
Session: Poster session 11
1622P - A phase II study of the first-in-class oral innate immune activator BXCL701 with pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Long-term follow-up
Presenter: Rahul Aggarwal
Session: Poster session 11
1623P - Prognostic value of circulating tumour DNA fraction in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Insights from the ProBio trial
Presenter: Alessio Crippa
Session: Poster session 11
1624P - Total and regional changes in body composition in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) patients randomized to receive androgen deprivation + enzalutamide +/- zoledronic acid: The BonEnza study
Presenter: Martina Buffoni
Session: Poster session 11
1625P - Fuzuloparib combined with abiraterone in the neoadjuvant treatment of localised high-risk prostate cancer (FAST-PC): A single-arm phase II study
Presenter: Yao Zhu
Session: Poster session 11