Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster session 11

1642P - Integrated prognostic score in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with cabazitaxel: A CABASTY posthoc analysis

Date

14 Sep 2024

Session

Poster session 11

Topics

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Charles Vauchier

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_2): S962-S1003. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1607

Authors

C. Vauchier, C. Thibault, M. VELEV, O. Becker, S. Oudard, E. Auclin

Author affiliations

  • Medical Oncology Department, HEGP - Hopital Europeen Georges-Pompidou - AP-HP, 75015 - Paris/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1642P

Background

Cabazitaxel (CBZ) is a standard in mCRPC patients (pts) who failed docetaxel (DOC) and an androgen receptor signalling inhibitor (ARSi). Primary results of CABASTY randomized trial comparing two CBZ schedules (triweekly 25mg/m2 vs biweekly 16mg/m2) in mCRPC patients ≥ 65 y.o. have been published (Oudard, JAMA Oncol 2023). This posthoc analysis aimed to build and validate a prognostic score for mCRPC pts treated with CBZ.

Methods

A continuous integrated score was derived from multivariate Cox model hazard ratios (HR). We used graphical verification for calibration, C-index for discrimination and bootstrap for cross-validation of the model. The population was stratified into 3 groups using hierarchical Log-Rank optimization for score thresholds. We used CARD randomized trial (CBZ vs ARSi in mCRPC pts failing DOC and the alternative ARSi) database for external validation.

Results

Overall, 194 pts from CABASTY were included to derive our score (median age 75, 62% ECOG PS 1-2, 48% Gleason score of 8-10, 44% ≥2 metastatic sites, median PSA 67 ng/mL). Model variables included ECOG PS (0 vs 1-2), number of metastatic sites (

Conclusions

We developed and validated a prognostic score for mCRPC pts treated with cabazitaxel. Favorable group was benefiting from CBZ versus a second ARSi, but intermediate and poor prognostic groups did not. This score may help clinicians to identify pts requiring other treatment strategies.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

ARTIC.

Funding

Sanofi.

Disclosure

C. Thibault: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Janssen, Astellas, Ipsen, Pfizer, Merck, MSD, BMS, AstraZeneca, AAA, Seagen; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Amgen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: AstraZeneca, Sanofi; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Janssen. S. Oudard: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, consultancy, advisory role: Sanofi; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, public speaking and advisory role: Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, advisory role and public speaking: AstraZeneca, MSD, Merck, Astellas, Ipsen, Pfizer, Roche, Genentech; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory board and public speaking: BMS, Bayer, Novartis. E. Auclin: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen, Sanofi-Genzyme; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel expenses: Amgen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.