Abstract 734P
Background
pR-GCT corresponds to the clinical case of retroperitoneal ascertained GCT without radiological evidence of primary testicular tumor and accounts for up to 40 % of extragonadal GCTs. An occult primary testicular tumor is often missed at diagnosis. Treatment modalities and outcomes have not been specifically addressed, preventing robust recommendations. We performed an international call to assess prognosis of treatment outcomes of these patients.
Methods
Clinical, pathological and treatment data pts with pR-GCT between 04/1988 and 01/2022 were retrospectively collected across 4 referral centers. Kaplan Meier methods, univariable and multivariable Cox regression models (MCRMs) were used.
Results
Ninety-nine patients (median age 37 yrs - IQR: 29-45) were collected. Ninety-three (94%) had histological diagnosis by biopsy or primary retroperitoneal lymph-node dissection (RPLND): 60 (62.5%) had non-seminomatous pR-GCTs (pR-NSGCTs) and 33 (34.4%) had seminomatous pR-GCTs (pR-SGCTs). IGCCCG prognostic allocation was possible in 91 pts: 34 (35.8%) were good, 23 (24.2%) intermediate and 34 (35.8%) poor risk, respectively. All pts underwent cisplatin-based chemotherapy, usually BEP regimen (94.9%). After chemotherapy, 25 (25.3%) pts underwent orchiectomy: viable tumor was present in 8 (32%), burn-out lesions in 6 (24%) and no lesion in 11 (44%) cases. After a median follow-up of 45 mos (IQR:15-90), the 5-years OS was 58%, being 85% in case of pR-SGCT and 46% in case of pR-NSGCT. According to IGCCCG classification 5-years OS was 83.3% for good, 57% for intermediate and 42% for poor risk patients, respectively. No difference in term of OS (60% vs 56%, p-value 0.81) was observed between patient who had or not radical orchiectomy. At MCRMs only IGCCCG poor risk category (HR 3.2, CI: 1.18-8.84, p-value 0.02) was independent predictors of a worse OS.
Conclusions
Eventually, a significant proportion of pts with a pR-GCT had a misclassified primary testicular tumor. 5 yrs-OS according to IGCCCG classification is worse than expected. The role of a surgical exploration of the suspected primary tumor remains controversial and the existence of a real category of p-GCT cannot be excluded.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Patrizia Giannatempo.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
P. Giannatempo: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Board: Pfizer, Astellas, MSD, Merk, Janssen; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Local PI: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
97P - Neoadjuvant durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (D+GemCis) versus gemcis alone for localized biliary tract cancer (BTC): Results of a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II trial (DEBATE)
Presenter: Changhoon Yoo
Session: Poster session 17
101P - Quality of life (QoL) outcomes in patients (pts) with zanidatamab (zani)-treated HER2-positive (HER2+) biliary tract cancer (BTC) in the phase IIb HERIZON-BTC-01 study
Presenter: Harpreet Wasan
Session: Poster session 17
102P - Potentially prognostic factors of overall survival in advanced biliary tract cancer in the randomised phase III TOPAZ-1 study
Presenter: Aiwu Ruth He
Session: Poster session 17
103P - Individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of randomised trials to compare efficacy of second-line fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC)
Presenter: Jaewon Hyung
Session: Poster session 17
104P - Final analysis of the prospective, randomized phase II STAMP trial: Adjuvant gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) versus capecitabine (CAP) in node-positive extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA)
Presenter: Hyehyun Jeong
Session: Poster session 17
105P - A phase II study of SHR-1316 plus IBI310 in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after failure of first-line therapy
Presenter: Jia Fan
Session: Poster session 17