Abstract 1176P
Background
The optimal duration of immunotherapy (ITH) for patients(pts) with unresectable/metastatic melanoma has not been defined and de-escalation strategies are under debate. Drug holidays are defined as intentional cessation of immunotherapy for period of time, in pts with therapy benefits, till potential progression (PD). While avails of drug holidays include reduction of toxicity and treatment cost as well as increased quality of pts' life, there are also potential risks including PD. Our study aimed to describe disease control upon drug holidays in melanoma pts treated with palliative ITH.
Methods
Pts with advanced unresectable/metastatic melanoma were treated with anti-PD1-based ITH. Patients were referred for drug holidays after ≥12 months of ITH. Pts who stopped the treatment due to toxicity were excluded from analysis. During study patients had imaging every 3 months. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were median duration of drug holiday, 2nd progression-free survival (PFS2) after PD on drug holidays.
Results
175 patients (80F/95M) treated for advanced unresectable/metastatic melanoma were referred for drug holidays. 116(67.4%) were BRAF-negative melanoma patients. 84 pts were treated with nivolumab, 6 with nivolumab+ipilimumab, 85 with pembrolizumab; and 152(86.9%) were treated in first line. Patients treated for ≥24 months(m) before drug holidays had significantly longer OS (p=0.003) and longer PFS till disease PD on drug holidays(p=0.00053) in multivariate analysis. PFS was dependent on best response before drug holidays with the longest in CR group (p=0.011). The median duration of drug holidays was 17 m (IQR: 8-24). At the median follow-up of 48 m (95%CI: 45-51), median OS was not reached, and 5-year OS rate was 89% (95%CI: 83-96). At ITH retreatment objective response was 64% and PFS2 rate at 1-year was 69% (95%CI: 48-99). At the time of analysis 141 pts were still on drug holidays and 11 died due to melanoma PD.
Conclusions
For melanoma pts drug holidays may be offered to ITH responders. The majority of melanoma patients on drug holidays are progression-free at 24m after ITH discontinuation. ITH rechallenge allows achieving disease control after initial progression on drug holidays.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
A.M. Czarnecka: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: BMS, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre. P. Teterycz: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel grant: Sanofi. L. GalusR. Dziura, B. Cybulska-Stopa: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: BMS, Roche, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre. J. Mackiewicz: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: BMS, GSK, Roche, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre. M. Ziętek: Financial Interests, Personal, Speaker’s Bureau: BMS, MSD, Novartis. P. Rutkowski: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Honoraria for Lectures: MSD, BMS, Pierre Fabre; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, BMS, Pierre Fabre, Merck, Sanofi, Blueprint Medicines, Philogen; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Merck, Sanofi, Novartis, AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, research grant for ISS: Pfizer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, research grant for institution: BMS; Non-Financial Interests, Member of Board of Directors: Polish Society of Surgical Oncology; Non-Financial Interests, Member of Board of Directors, President: Polish Oncological Society. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1109P - Second-line pembrolizumab (pembro) in Chinese patients (pts) with advanced melanoma: Long-term follow-up of the phase I KEYNOTE-151 study
Presenter: Lu Si
Session: Poster session 13
1110P - A phase II clinical trial of SHR-1701 combined with temozolomide for advanced melanoma
Presenter: Tu Hu
Session: Poster session 13
1111P - A randomised phase II study of intermittent versus continuous dosing of targeted therapy in patients with BRAFV600 mutant advanced melanoma (INTERIM)
Presenter: Avinash Gupta
Session: Poster session 13
1112P - Five-year survival after intermittent targeted therapy and anti-PD1 in stage IV melanoma: An update of the IMPemBra trial
Presenter: Lotte Hoeijmakers
Session: Poster session 13
1113P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (enco) + binimetinib (bini) vs vemurafenib (vemu) or enco in patients (pts) with BRAF V600–mutant melanoma
Presenter: Dirk Schadendorf
Session: Poster session 13
1114P - Encorafenib (E) plus binimetinib (B) in unresectable advanced or metastatic BRAFV600-mut melanoma, real-world evidence in Spain (GEM 2002 - BECARE)
Presenter: Ainara Soria Rivas
Session: Poster session 13
1115P - Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of dabrafenib/trametinib versus vemurafenib/cobimetinib therapy in routine medical practice: Eight years of BRAF/MEK inhibitor use in routine clinical practice
Presenter: Karolina Piejko
Session: Poster session 13
1116P - Long term outcome of complete responders to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) or target therapy (TT) in advanced melanoma
Presenter: Celine Boutros
Session: Poster session 13
1117P - Overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma treated with encorafenib plus binimetinib (ENCO+BINI): Comparing real-world vs clinical trial data
Presenter: Gino In
Session: Poster session 13
1118P - Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with BRAF+ metastatic melanoma refractory to first-line immunotherapy
Presenter: Thach-Giao Truong
Session: Poster session 13