Abstract 2045P
Background
The success of cancer therapy relies on patient adherence, which refers to the extent to which a person's behaviour - taking medication, following a diet, and/or executing lifestyle changes, corresponds with agreed recommendations from a health care provider ( WHO 2003 ). Several PROMs were developed to measure patient adherence to (cancer) therapy. In light of this, our study aims to offer a comprehensive overview of PROMs in the cancer field, with a specific focus on the adherence dimensions captured.
Methods
A systematic review of systematic reviews was performed to identify studies of cancer patients that apply PROMs to measure adherence without restriction to the type of therapy. Databases of Pubmed and Embase were searched up to March 2022 and studies were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria. A qualitative synthesis was used determining measurement of adherence and dimensions of PROMs according to the WHO definition for adherence.
Results
After screening 4483 results a total of 56 literature reviews were included capturing 1064 studies that focused on cancer patients. Out of the 56 literature reviews included in our final analysis, the majority (45) focused on medication adherence, while 18 studies assessed adherence to dietary recommendations, and 13 studies examined adherence to lifestyle changes. Three studies investigated other dimensions of adherence. Data collection was primarily carried out via questionnaires and most studies applied self-developed, non-validated PROMs. PROMs mainly measured one dimension of adherence, even though the content of items were overlapping between medication, diet and lifestyle.
Conclusions
This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive overview of PROMs used to assess adherence in oncology. Our analysis highlights the predominance of studies measuring medication adherence and underscores the need for greater attention to other dimensions of adherence. Our findings can inform the choice of PROMs to monitor patients’ adherence in clinical practice and enhance health outcomes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2116P - Preoperative body mass index, waist circumference, and mortality after major cancer surgery: A nationwide cohort study in South Korea
Presenter: Jiwon Yoon
Session: Poster session 06
2117P - Dietary patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with lung cancer: What needs to change
Presenter: Imanuely Borchardt
Session: Poster session 06
2118P - Refeeding syndrome: A prospective analysis in adults admitted to an oncology hospital
Presenter: Filipe Gonçalves
Session: Poster session 06
2119P - The prognostic impact of nutritional assessment and scores in advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Sara Torresan
Session: Poster session 06
2120P - Nutritional deficiency post gastric cancer surgery
Presenter: Abay Makishev
Session: Poster session 06
2121P - Association between nutritional status and adverse events in gastrointestinal cancer patients undergoing outpatient chemotherapy in Japan
Presenter: Naoko Sato
Session: Poster session 06
2122P - Clinical significance of oncology patients’ nutritional status assessment
Presenter: Efthymios Kostaridis
Session: Poster session 06
2123P - Value of immuno-nutritional scores in the prognosis of hospitalised patients with lung cancer
Presenter: Jesús López
Session: Poster session 06
2124P - The impact of NUTRItional status at first medical oncology visit ON Clinical Outcomes: The NUTRIONCO study
Presenter: Maurizio Muscaritoli
Session: Poster session 06
2125P - Potential ROle of hypoVItaminosis D in patiENts with cancer treated with immune ChEckpoint inhibitors (PROVIDENCE): A prospective observational study
Presenter: Alessio Cortellini
Session: Poster session 06