Abstract 2045P
Background
The success of cancer therapy relies on patient adherence, which refers to the extent to which a person's behaviour - taking medication, following a diet, and/or executing lifestyle changes, corresponds with agreed recommendations from a health care provider ( WHO 2003 ). Several PROMs were developed to measure patient adherence to (cancer) therapy. In light of this, our study aims to offer a comprehensive overview of PROMs in the cancer field, with a specific focus on the adherence dimensions captured.
Methods
A systematic review of systematic reviews was performed to identify studies of cancer patients that apply PROMs to measure adherence without restriction to the type of therapy. Databases of Pubmed and Embase were searched up to March 2022 and studies were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria. A qualitative synthesis was used determining measurement of adherence and dimensions of PROMs according to the WHO definition for adherence.
Results
After screening 4483 results a total of 56 literature reviews were included capturing 1064 studies that focused on cancer patients. Out of the 56 literature reviews included in our final analysis, the majority (45) focused on medication adherence, while 18 studies assessed adherence to dietary recommendations, and 13 studies examined adherence to lifestyle changes. Three studies investigated other dimensions of adherence. Data collection was primarily carried out via questionnaires and most studies applied self-developed, non-validated PROMs. PROMs mainly measured one dimension of adherence, even though the content of items were overlapping between medication, diet and lifestyle.
Conclusions
This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive overview of PROMs used to assess adherence in oncology. Our analysis highlights the predominance of studies measuring medication adherence and underscores the need for greater attention to other dimensions of adherence. Our findings can inform the choice of PROMs to monitor patients’ adherence in clinical practice and enhance health outcomes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2066P - Evaluation of the quality and reliability of ChatGPT and Perplexity's responses about rectal cancer
Presenter: Ozan Yazici
Session: Poster session 06
2067P - Influence of psychiatric disorders on survival in patients with lung cancer: Real-world data
Presenter: Tomi Kovacevic
Session: Poster session 06
2068P - Perspectives and concerns on sexuality among adolescents and young adults treated for testicular germ cell tumour: The PRICELESS-study - A qualitative study
Presenter: Danielle Zweers
Session: Poster session 06
2069P - QoL changes of caregivers during first-line palliative chemotherapy for patients with incurable cancer
Presenter: Nobumichi Takeuchi
Session: Poster session 06
2070P - Assessment of healthy lifestyle habits in breast cancer patients
Presenter: Juan Cristobal Sanchez
Session: Poster session 06
2071P - Identification of top issues and concerns of cancer patients in Korea on social media
Presenter: Joo Han Lim
Session: Poster session 06
2072P - Topical application of mixed agents to reduce oral mucositis during radiotherapy in post operated head and neck cancer
Presenter: Chandra Prakash
Session: Poster session 06
2073P - Medical cannabis: A potential effective treatment for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN)
Presenter: Ravit Geva
Session: Poster session 06
2074P - Oral cannabidiol for prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
Presenter: Sebastian Nielsen
Session: Poster session 06