Abstract 2045P
Background
The success of cancer therapy relies on patient adherence, which refers to the extent to which a person's behaviour - taking medication, following a diet, and/or executing lifestyle changes, corresponds with agreed recommendations from a health care provider ( WHO 2003 ). Several PROMs were developed to measure patient adherence to (cancer) therapy. In light of this, our study aims to offer a comprehensive overview of PROMs in the cancer field, with a specific focus on the adherence dimensions captured.
Methods
A systematic review of systematic reviews was performed to identify studies of cancer patients that apply PROMs to measure adherence without restriction to the type of therapy. Databases of Pubmed and Embase were searched up to March 2022 and studies were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria. A qualitative synthesis was used determining measurement of adherence and dimensions of PROMs according to the WHO definition for adherence.
Results
After screening 4483 results a total of 56 literature reviews were included capturing 1064 studies that focused on cancer patients. Out of the 56 literature reviews included in our final analysis, the majority (45) focused on medication adherence, while 18 studies assessed adherence to dietary recommendations, and 13 studies examined adherence to lifestyle changes. Three studies investigated other dimensions of adherence. Data collection was primarily carried out via questionnaires and most studies applied self-developed, non-validated PROMs. PROMs mainly measured one dimension of adherence, even though the content of items were overlapping between medication, diet and lifestyle.
Conclusions
This systematic literature review provides a comprehensive overview of PROMs used to assess adherence in oncology. Our analysis highlights the predominance of studies measuring medication adherence and underscores the need for greater attention to other dimensions of adherence. Our findings can inform the choice of PROMs to monitor patients’ adherence in clinical practice and enhance health outcomes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2056P - Hospitalization, reconsultations and mortality in the field of oncological emergencies: Who is at higher risk?
Presenter: Eugenia María Martínez Madrid
Session: Poster session 06
2057P - Prevalence of frailty in long-term prostate cancer survivors after radical prostatectomy and its association with quality of life and emotional health
Presenter: Valentin Meissner
Session: Poster session 06
2058P - Reducing waste to improve sustainability and affordability of cancer treatment: Redispensing unused oral anticancer drugs
Presenter: Lisa-Marie Smale
Session: Poster session 06
2059P - The impact of a dental oncology clinic for patients (pts) prescribed bone-modifying agents (BMA) in a cancer centre
Presenter: Harriet Byrne
Session: Poster session 06
2060P - Prevalence and predictor of poor mental adjustment to cancer before lung cancer surgery
Presenter: Junhee Park
Session: Poster session 06
2061P - Network analysis of comprehensive concerns in patients with cancer: Differences between the sexes
Presenter: Kazumasa Yamamoto
Session: Poster session 06
2062P - The psychological distress (PsyD) evaluation in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients (pts): A mono-institutional analysis
Presenter: Maria Bensi
Session: Poster session 06
2063P - Lifestyle changes as cancer treatment: It is time to get specific with our patients
Presenter: Ana Isabel Martin Quesada
Session: Poster session 06
2064P - Hospitalisation of patients with cancer: Identifying points for improvement in patient care in a university hospital in Spain
Presenter: Silvia Roa
Session: Poster session 06
2065P - Communication on the first medical oncology appointment: What do cancer patients want?
Presenter: Rodrigo Vicente
Session: Poster session 06