Abstract 440P
Background
This study aimed to determine whether molecular subtype does impact patient response to palliative radiotherapy in metastatic breast cancer.
Methods
All metastatic breast cancer patients referred for palliative radiotherapy (either for pain-relief or spinal cord/nerve decompression), between 2017 and 2022, were included in this study. Patient response to radiotherapy was evaluated at 3 weeks from radiotherapy. Re-irradiation need was assessed. Radiotherapy outcomes were statistically analyzed with regards to breast cancer molecular subtypes.
Results
Data of 137 metastatic breast cancer patients were evaluated. Ductal cell carcinoma was the most common histological type. Patients’ distribution according to molecular subtype was as follow: 17% of luminal A tumors, 72% of luminal B tumors, 6% of Her2 tumors and 5% of triple-negative tumors. All patients received single fraction palliative radiotherapy with a prescription dose of 8 Gy and 6 Gy respectively in 77 % and 13 % of cases. Forty-six patients were lost to follow-up and one patient didn’t complete treatment. Complete response to radiotherapy was reported in 21%, 54% and 50% of cases, respectively for luminal A, luminal B and Her2 tumors. No complete response was found in the triple-negative breast cancer subgroup. The “no response to radiotherapy” rate for luminal A and luminal B tumors, was 21% and 20% respectively. Re-irradiation of the same metastatic subsite was performed in 8 patients, all with luminal B molecular subtype. Although not statistically significant, luminal tumors tended to respond better to palliative radiotherapy when compared to non-luminal tumors, with a complete response rate of 48% versus 30% respectively (p=0.3). No statistically significant correlation was found between breast cancer molecular subtype and radiotherapy outcomes.
Conclusions
This study suggests that breast cancer subtypes do exhibit differential responses to palliative radiotherapy. Yet molecular subtype failed to reliably predict radiotherapy outcomes and identify patients who would derive greater than average benefit from palliative radiotherapy. Further studies are needed to identify reliable biomarkers predictive of likely radiotherapy sensitivity.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
338P - Breast cancer follow-up: A population-based cohort study
Presenter: Serena Di Cosimo
Session: Poster session 03
339P - An online mindfulness-based stress-reduction (MBSR) intervention for breast cancer (BC) survivors: A randomized trial
Presenter: Misael Salazar-Alejo
Session: Poster session 03
340P - Novel application of spatial analyses to investigate environmental factors and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
Presenter: Alexandra Thomas
Session: Poster session 03
341P - Impact of environmental temperature on clinical outcomes of early-stage breast cancer (BC)
Presenter: Arya Mariam Roy
Session: Poster session 03
342P - Fertility preservation in young breast cancer patients: Patient's knowledge and perception
Presenter: Zeineb Naimi
Session: Poster session 03
343P - Modulation of the immune system (ImS) during moderate physical activity (mPA) in breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)
Presenter: Ornella Garrone
Session: Poster session 03
344P - Epidemiological analysis and overall survival of female breast cancer in a developing middle eastern country over 18 years
Presenter: Mahmoud Abunasser
Session: Poster session 03
345P - The effect of early post-operative exercise on shoulder function in breast cancer patients: A randomised controlled trial
Presenter: Jihee Min
Session: Poster session 03
348P - Long-term opioid use following treatment of localized breast cancer: A real-world analysis
Presenter: Ayelet Shai
Session: Poster session 03